-
Essay / Strengths and weaknesses of the inquisitorial system
In the inquisitorial system, it is believed that all results are fair. Indeed, the judge is specially trained to collect and evaluate evidence in order to reveal the truth. Under these conditions, a trial can only take place if there is sufficiently strong evidence to convict the accused. The inquisitorial system is also believed to be more accessible than the adversarial system, as the investigation, preparation and presentation of a case is carried out by the state, so that individuals are not left with high legal costs. The inquisitorial system also offers an intermediate verdict of “accusation not proven”. This benefit is linked to a just outcome, as it allows a trial to be suspended until new evidence can be gathered, ensuring that a guilty party will not go free. The inquisitorial system also does not provide for a jury. This ensures that no unqualified person determines the fate of others.