blog




  • Essay / A Critical Review of the Dimensionalization of Cultures: Hofstede's Model in Context by Geert Hofstede

    According to Hofstede's model, culture consists of six dimensions, which is considered a creative method of cultural research. However, it is essential to analyze Hofstede's model critically. The model also has some limitations, e.g. small sample size, ignoring the rigor of defining culture, simplifying cultural measures as a bipolar phenomenon, etc., which has introduced various criticisms for its famous dimensions. Above all, Hofstede's concept of cultural measurement was heavily criticized on several occasions – all this shortly after its first publication. Although some of Hofstede's dimensions, such as individualism versus collectivism, support Parsons and Shils' (1951) findings quite well that a person reflects a culture in an organization based on their personal and group choices. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Whether a person behaves the same way at home, with friends or at work, it can always create an argument. Hofstede and Goffman (1959) improbably argue that everyone wears a different mask, depending on the environment in which they find themselves. It depicts society as a drama where everything is a spectacle. Individuals wear masks; They adapt to others and their environment. The theme is no longer stable, but “liquid”. The behaviors adopted by a person in their personal and family life are very different from those adopted in a work environment, which is why the final result of Hofstede's research cannot be transferred to culture. Trompenaars, Hampden–Turner (1997). On the one hand, given the compliments, approval and reliability of his study by many researchers, these results can be considered a new international influence. On the other hand, certain facets of his results have been strongly criticized, his research methodology could be an example. The ultimate definition of culture he describes could lead to another disagreement. Moving on Fang (2003) even called into question the Confucian dynamism which is in fact the solid foundation of the fifth dimension. Many portrait experiences, not necessarily dominant models from different angles within a society, must be the same. Therefore, much research reveals that the practices of individualism and collectivism are more likely to adapt to this social culture. Do IBM employees share the same values ​​as everyone else? According to McSweeney, there is no reason to believe that IBM's response reflects the "national average." First, because IBM is not a "typical" public company, and second, employees are likely to become separated from the rest of the population because "it's not very common to work for a high-tech company in a third world country. Hofstede simplifies its searches not only to all types of workers available in a country, but also to every individual with the same nationality. This is not a relevant sample size for identifying the power distance of a country as a whole. Sample sizes in some countries, although there is a large amount of data overall. For example, only six countries out of 40 countries had more than 1,000 respondents, and 15 countries had fewer than 200 respondents. The dimensions created by culture are always complex and intangible Clyde Kluckhohn (1962). However, seven conceptual dimensions differentiate the cultural dimension according to.