Government surveillance is a problem that everyone should be aware of and wary of. The subject is presented to the public as an effective tactic to guarantee the security of the country and the citizens who reside there. While this may be true, the downsides are not discussed, and government officials such as James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, have been caught lying on camera about the programs in place, with little or no no negative reactions. While this may seem like an isolated problem, nationwide surveillance is part of a larger, recurring strategy that has existed for centuries. The problem stems from the deceptive tactics used by governments to gain control of their countries by hiding controversial policies, laws and regulations behind foreign and domestic threats that are intended to attack the people, their way of life and the country itself. even. Allowing this to happen can lead to things quickly spiraling out of control. It is therefore necessary to monitor and, if necessary, arrest to maintain public order, liberty and freedom. Examining and contextualizing Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, and the French Revolution has highlighted the damage that the people's blind trust in government can cause. Although these issues have proven difficult to resolve and dangerous to dissolve, preventative measures are the best way to prevent such deceptions from occurring. As a simple guide, here are three questions every person should ask themselves often on different topics to ensure they are aware of the situation: Do the proposed solutions remove the rights of the country's citizens? Do the policies put in place really solve the problem? And who do these laws help? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayThe most important question to ask because it makes it clear whether a political body such as a party or the government is doing something of evil is; Are they depriving people of their rights and freedoms to solve the problem at hand? This is often seen as a necessary evil, and this way of thinking has merit. Change can happen more quickly if the government is able to ignore certain limitations created by democratic states and is able to focus solely on solving a single problem. The problem is that whoever is the leader and the new holder of this absolute power must use it only for the purposes for which it is intended, which represents a very important risk to take in favor of change. The rise of Nazism and Hitler's rise to power provide a prime historical example of how the promise of improvement can go horribly wrong when the trust of a nation's people is put in the wrong hands. After the surrender of German military forces on November 11 and a formal armistice to end the conflict on the Western Front of World War I later that morning, Germany was a crippled country. The implementation of the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 weakened the country, its economy, its population and its morale through ridiculous demands placed on the government. Forced to repay debt incurred by Allied countries during the war, he limited Germany's ability to get back on its feet. This could be described as a breeding ground for the development of racist ideology such as Nazism and a perfect storm for the emergence of adictator like Adolf Hitler. Through his manipulative tactics and clever use of public fears and frustrations, Adolf Hitler presented attractive ways to solve various problems facing the country while disenfranchising his people. Once Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, the National Socialist German Workers' Party worked to resolve the communist revolution that they believed was about to take place. As Joseph Goebbels, the new head of the Reich Ministry of Education and Propaganda, suggested or predicted in his diary, he commented: "In a conference with the Führer we set the lines of the fight against the Red Terror... The Bolshevik revolutionary attempt must first ignite.” With little evidence of a real threat coming from communist parties located in Germany and the public not entirely convinced, Nazi leaders launched their own declaration of communist war by lighting fire at the Reichstag, an important political building in the German history. The blame was easily placed on a socialist arsonist named Marinus Van Der Lubbe, who conveniently bragged about wanting to burn down the German parliament building. The NSGWP was then able to use this attack on the country to propose the Reichstag Fire Decree, which deprives the German people of many civil liberties, all in the context of protection and security. This gave Hitler and the soldiers of the Sturmabteilung's "Storm Detachment" carte blanche to suppress any contradictory political beliefs people may or may not have, without any legal repercussions. It was "the first experience the Germans had had with government-sponsored Nazi terror." . Then, after months of speeches about the crippling Treaty of Versailles and how business and commerce would flourish under Nazi Party control, Hitler dissolved all unions. On May 2, a day ironically intended to celebrate German workers and their economic rights, they were actually stripped from citizens in the streets. This tactic to take control of the economy was far more blatant than the well-planned staging of a communist revolution, but it had its effect. Hitler and his party now had the ability to control exports and imports, allowing businesses to prosper if their owners donated to the party or ruining them if they did not. During an entire campaign to convince the country that the economy would succeed under Nazi rule, those who benefited were not the workers and hard workers of the middle and lower classes, but the politicians and the chancellor himself- even. Finally, the Untermensch or Subhuman in English were groups of racial, sexual and religious minorities who were slandered, attacked and almost eradicated in the name of purification and a better German nation. Increasingly powerful, Adolf Hitler and the Nazi movement turned more of their attention to presenting these minorities as the cause of the German people's problems through speeches and a constant stream of propaganda led by Joseph Goebbels. As Hitler stated in his “autobiography” Mein Kampf: “All the great cultures of the past perished only because the original creative race became extinct through blood poisoning.” Hitler attacked African Americans, homosexuals and primarily the Jewish population. The suppression of these people's rights was not immediate, but his speeches and his book laid the foundations for a racist ideology that germinated in the minds of German citizens. There was a boycott of allJewish businesses and then slums were created to house Jewish families in appalling living conditions, and through the use of mass labor concentration camps, Jewish families were executed on a scale never before seen. Through compelling solutions to seemingly pressing problems such as the threat of a communist revolution, the failing economy, and the impurity of the gene pool, Hitler took away most, and for some, all, of their personal and economic freedoms. to create a powerful, dominant power and a ruthless totalitarian dictatorship. Second, it is possible that the proposed plan, which removes the rights and freedoms of a country's citizens, will not solve the problem. This may be due to a lack of focus on the specific problem or a blatant disregard for the original motive. This can be seen in Russia in the early 20th century, where the power that a communist dictatorship had over the country was abused. The origins of communism in Russia are largely due to the monarchy's terrible military campaign during the First World War. Poor planning, outdated tactics and poorly prepared soldiers led to the massacre of thousands of Russian soldiers. which led to the revolt against the commanders on the front lines, and ultimately to the overthrow of the imperial government and the Romanov dynasty. What made socialism such an attractive political system to the Russian people was that, as in many industrialized societies, the working class made up a significant percentage of the population. This means that the writings of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels resonated with large numbers of people and generations of workers. The Bolshevik movement, through the Russian Revolution and the Russian Civil War, was inspired by the sufferings of the Russian proletariat and convinced them that the philosophy proposed by Marx was the answer to their problems, that "they were the slaves of the bourgeois class and the bourgeois state. ; they were daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overseer and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer.” This equality, the destruction of the upper class and the acceptance of collectivism would create a utopia from which all could benefit. These proposed and implemented solutions did not work as promised, because Joseph Stalin's strict regime limited solutions to the benefit of his own party, not those who were suffering. Equality and how to achieve it were not specifically addressed in the writings of Karl Marx, but the injustices and inequalities created by capitalism in nations were. This led to socialist politicians such as Vladimir Lenin having to come up with their own solutions to the inequalities workers faced, without clear guidance from the most respected communists, Marx and Engels. Lenin, with the creation of the Leninist movement, carried out extreme political reforms in the country, mainly improving the conditions and quality of life of the lower classes. He attempted to address inequalities such as the exploitation of the working class and the lack of rights and options for Russian women who wanted to earn a living. Many people benefited from the policy change, but the redistribution of private property created new forms of injustice. Factory and business owners lost their homes and the source of income they depended entirely on to make a living. Second, class struggle has always been a major issue in Marxist theory and philosophy and both Lenin and Stalin attempted to resolve it. To justify the unfair treatment suffered bymiddle and upper classes, both communist leaders relied on the victimization mentality of the Slavic people. Painting oneself as a victim allows for a deflection of responsibility and a desire to be compensated by any means necessary. This is what Lenin and Stalin drew inspiration from and used to strip the upper classes or bourgeois of their means of production as well as their homes, forcing them to obtain lower paying jobs than was available to them. 'State, as long as the State did. not executing them, which was common during Lenin's Red Terror and Stalin's Great Purge. The removal of upper-class citizens who owned land, employed workers, and ran various institutions in the community meant that they had to be replaced. This led to the creation of a new, similar upper class, known as the Nomenklatura. Instead of being run independently, all members of the Nomenklatur were employed by the state, which only created another class struggle, but in the name of communism. What someone needs to ask is “do these solutions solve the problem?” » If not, there is a legitimate reason to be concerned, especially when people's rights are restricted in an attempt to achieve an unnecessary solution. The final question to answer is “Who really benefits from these movements, policies and laws?” " because when a government gets too much power and control, as we saw in the French Revolution as well as Nazi Germany and Communist Russia, the people at the top tend to improve their lives, not that of others In the beginning of the movement, the French Revolution was an attempt for a better country for all, with the removal of the death penalty, the redistribution of power giving more influence to people living in poverty and a better. third estate: so many objectives put forward in parliament Although this was the initial motive, time brings changes for better or worse and the ideals were lost and the Jacobins, Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety. created a complete oligarchy that only sought to maintain power Through increased political violence and the destruction of the monarchy due to the beheading of King Louis XVI, a tyrant named Robespierre came to power. He still preached equality, liberty and fraternity, but imposed severe punishments and took power only for himself. He created a climate of fear in France and led them into what is now known as the reign of terror. This same situation can be seen in Nazi Germany, where Adolf Hitler created a movement to improve the lives of ordinary Germans, but what was created was an authoritarian government that lied, scapegoated, and murdered to gain access to power. The German economy appeared to be recovering, an illusion created by the Mefo bill which helped German industry grow in secrecy from other countries until its collapse, and by the withdrawal of Jewish business owners who helped create jobs for “Germans”. The Nazi government's tight grip on the economy sometimes helped people, but it also completely ruined others and it was not in the name of the public interest. The Communist Movement in Russia was promised to help the proletariat. After decades of oppression, people were looking for change, to improve their lives in any way possible. Although the socialist party led by Lenin, and then followed by Stalin, talked about its plans to help ordinary people, what the party fought for was complete control over the.