-
Essay / A study on the relevance of conflict in our society
Conflict is defined as a hostile relationship between 2 or more people that presents intense and intransigent differences. Since humans are very diverse and sociable in nature, it is easy to see how conflict is relevant in everyday life, from relationships to more serious/violent cases of conflict in careers such as policing . This article will demonstrate the relevance of conflict in our society by describing and analyzing an actual conflict in policing in Canada, explain my thoughts, feelings, behaviors and reflections on my simulation lab experience and explain why my point view of frontline police offices has changed. .Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Conflict within the police force is not always present, but there are certainly times when duties collide with conflict with civilians. For example: On April 25, 2017, around midnight, a police officer in West Perth, Ontario received a call which subsequently resulted in an SIU investigation. A concerned citizen called police to alert them of a drunk driver at a local Tim Hortons. When the officer realized that the suspect had left the scene, several other officers joined him in pursuing the suspect by strategically blocking certain exits. A police officer was able to locate the suspect and successfully arrest him. The suspect, a 35-year-old man, complied by giving the officer his license and other relevant information. Once the officer learned that the suspect had multiple warrants for his arrest, he called another officer for backup. The second officer arrived shortly after and parked in front of the suspect's vehicle to prevent him from entering. As police approached the vehicle, it became apparent that the suspect was uncooperative as he did not want to communicate. The police threatened to open the window, but the suspect rear-ended the Chevrolet Tahoe into a police vehicle, then struck the second police car as he escaped the officer's gunshot and fled the scene. places. The suspect hid for the rest of the evening until he was chased by another officer, resulting in a “cat and mouse” chase for a few hours. Eventually, police caught up with the driver as he crashed into a tree and attempted to flee on foot. The suspect climbed a fence and, despite several warnings from an officer to cooperate, was shot twice with a Taser. The suspect continued to resist, so the officer tackled him to the ground and punched him in the shoulder in order to regain control and arrest him. The suspect suffered serious injuries to his collarbone and, as it was an “in-custody injury,” the SIU investigated the case further. The results published in September 2018 concluded that the force of the police officer was adequate since the suspect resisted several times. The injuries suffered by the suspect are also believed to have occurred while the victim was climbing the fence. Since there is no article other than the SIU report, no information was available regarding the exact charges filed. I suspect the lack of information is because the incident was being investigated at the time. This example can be analyzed at each stage of the conflict process: before the incident, the prelude, there would have to be pre-existing ideas about ethics, behaviors, opinions about police powers, and much more than Icould not be analyzed from an outside point of view. Second, there is the triggering event: the suspect was driving under the influence. Then the reaction to the suspect's behavior (drunk driving) becomes evident when the cops pull him over to investigate further. The differentiation stage occurs when the suspect and the police compete for power. In this case, the conflict escalates as the chase continues. Finally, the resolution in which the police finally arrested the suspect and arrested him. It's also important to note that a whole other conflict begins as the SIU investigates the situation. Along with this connection, this incident could be defined as an intangible conflict because there is no struggle for goods or property, but there is a struggle between power, ethics and cooperation between the suspect and the police. The suspect deliberately avoided the police on numerous occasions, demonstrating his desire for power and freedom, as well as the police's desire for cooperation, justice and power. This incident is also an example of the concurrent cycle; a type of dysfunctional conflict style. Although this example doesn't look exactly like the cycle, it relies on the same concepts: Competing cycles often occur in threatening situations when there are no other options to turn to. Along with this similarity, they both have the same distinguishing characteristic of “winning” or “losing” a conflict. I imagine the suspect and the police had this mindset: either the suspect was fleeing or the suspect was being killed. brought to justice. To better understand the reality of conflict in everyday police work, I completed a conflict management simulation at Humber College. The Sim Lab is an interactive virtual reality simulator that challenges the user to use and learn conflict management skills in a seemingly real-world scenario. As I waited for my simulation lab appointment, I felt very anxious. I understood that it was a simulation and that the outcome of the scenario was not evaluated, but I was still panicked because I didn't know what to expect. (As an aside, I had forgotten to take some of my medications the day before, so I was even more anxious than usual). When I was called and the instructor started explaining to me how to use the weapons, I felt very overwhelmed and started crying. The instructor helped me calm down a lot, but I still felt very worried even after the test scenario. I jumped straight into the storyline because I just wanted it to end. In retrospect, the scenario unfolded very quickly and seemed quite real, aside from the delay in response times. In short, my scenario involved a mentally ill middle-aged man walking through a public park with a large knife in his hand. This is an intangible conflict because there is a struggle for freedom (not wanting to return to the mental hospital) as well as more complex struggles related to mental health. As I assessed the situation, I began to sympathize with this man - even though he wasn't real. This man was mentally ill and no longer taking medication, so I could imagine how intimidated he might have felt by authority figures armed with various weapons. I approached the man with my palms facing up to show him there was no weapon outside, and an open posture in an attempt to be seen as friendly. The man seemed calm at first, but became aggressive when I asked him to put the knife down so we could talk. The man began to wave the knife because he feared he would have to return,.