Have you ever doubted the level of knowledge people should have to have confidence in themselves? I always ask myself these kinds of questions. I still doubt my knowledge, my self-confidence and everything I have learned in my life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay “We know with confidence only when we know little; with knowledge, doubt increases.” This is a quote adapted from JW von Goethe. But what does JW von Goethe want to communicate with the words: trust and doubt? The title above identifies a correlation between two key terms for knowledge interpretation. A corresponding link is established between confidence and doubt. To provide an explanation for the statement, I will define these two terms. What is trust? What is doubt? On the one hand, the word confidence has been defined as: “The state of feeling certain of the truth of something.” » Speaking of confidence, “it can be described as a belief in one's ability to succeed. In the purest sense, confidence expresses the knowledge you put into doing a certain kind of thing and more specifically what you are good at. On the other hand, doubt is “a feeling of uncertainty or lack of conviction.” As we can read in the Oxford Dictionary definition, it is clear how these two names are the opposite of a very specific feeling. In life, as in school, we always tend to reflect on our knowledge. “The concept of doubt as a suspense between two contradictory propositions covers a range of phenomena at the level of the mind, it involves a reasoned examination of facts and evidence and at the emotional level, belief in disbelief. Some branches of philosophy devote a lot of effort to distinguishing between the doubtful, the probable and the certain. “Everyone is attracted to confidence and repelled by doubt, and this shows in all aspects of life, whether personal, professional or political. Talking about confidence does not mean that doubt does not exist, it means that we can develop the confidence to be the stronger of the two. One thing I have learned in my life is that we do not live by being confident or doubting ourselves, but by living our lives as both. The title confronts and challenges the mutual relationship between doubt and trust. The title can be approached by studying its reliability in relation to two areas of knowledge: ethics and the human sciences. I decided to explore these two Areas of Knowledge because after reading the title several times, in order to understand it better, I realized the importance of these two in relation to doubts and confidence. Ethics will give me the opportunity to reflect on the role of philosophy in today's knowledge. On the other hand, I will examine the role and aspect of dictatorship. The first question that comes to mind when I read JW von Goethe's quote is "how do we know when we know little?" » Socrates once said: “I know that I know nothing”, this legend is one of the most famous of all time about knowledge. Socrates was and still is one of the most brilliant and important philosophers. He is well known as the first moral philosopher and also the founder of Western philosophy. The quote I cited earlier confirms that in general, people are more confident when they know little. “The expression itself derives from Plato's account of Socrates. In Apology, a Socratic dialogue, Plato relates that Socrates explains that he seems wiser than anyone else because he does not imagine he knows whatthat he doesn't know. “So it seems to me that, in this little thing, I am wiser than this man, at least, that what I do not know, I do not think I know either. Analyzing the phrase that Socrates is trying to express from a modern perspective, when we think about what we know, it is usually determined by what we know that we don't know. An example are the ignorant, they tend to think that what they know is all they need to know, so it seems like they know everything. Looking at it another way, when people understand how much there is to know that they don't know, then what they do know seems very little in contrast. I personally think what Socrates is trying to express is that no one really knows how much knowledge they have, even if it is minimal. On the other hand, a question I asked myself was "how is it possible that one of the most intelligent philosophers of all time knows nothing?" Socrates was known for his intelligence, knowledge and skill. His quotes have always been used in life, especially in school, to make people understand that even the smartest philosopher of all time cannot know anything. I believe that knowledge is a powerful tool that we sometimes underestimate, but on the other hand, I have a firm belief that life in each of its aspects is as beautiful because of the lack of knowledge that we possess. Because of doubts we cannot resolve and questions we cannot answer. I believe that a life with full knowledge of everything would not be healthy. I personally think that what Socrates and in this case Ethics want to explain is that “no one really knows anything, but I really know this thing, therefore I know something”. In life, no matter how much knowledge an individual is capable of acquiring, that knowledge is just a mere drop in the ocean of available knowledge. Unlike ethics, in the human sciences, knowledge is acquired through quantitative and qualitative data. It is therefore based on the variability of theories which interpret the non-spontaneous prediction of behaviors and behavioral choices. The second area of ​​knowledge that I decided to analyze is that of the humanities. “How reliable are the humanities? branch of study that deals with people or their actions, including the social sciences and humanities, as opposed to the natural sciences or physical sciences. » Reviewing all the different aspects of this field of knowledge, I decided to study how the role of politics, therefore world politics is related, linked to knowledge. A fundamental argument for the history and politics of any country is the role of dictatorship. “Dictatorship, a form of government in which one person or small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations. » “To what extent can a government impact citizen trust? » Looking at the role and function of citizens in the dictatorship, it is possible to see how people react when they know with confidence and when they have doubts about something. In July 2015, the last round of elections reached almost 100% voter turnout. Despite their will and desire to be democratic people, they have been classified among the most authoritarian and least democratic peoples. North Korea is known as a totalitarian state, ruled by a dynastic line of dictators. Since North Korea publicly executes its citizens for any anti-state actions, this is not a good idea. When the.