There is a preconceived notion that women lie about being raped or sexually assaulted. It is precisely between sexuality and gender that the politics of rape cases lie. Oscillating between the two, these cases are full of controversy on many aspects. Consent, penetration, duration and identification are all concepts of rape and sexual assault that must be addressed in a file. As if the act of assault and rape itself was not enough, victims must go through the legal process to hope that their attacker will be prosecuted accordingly. However, because the idea of ​​consent is not something easily proven and clarified, victims are vulnerable to the freedom of a completely guilty defendant. One aspect of rape and sexual assault cases that needs to be changed is the identification of the victim herself. A victim should have every right to completely hide their identity from the outside press, be excused from appearing in court, and, above all, have as little or no contact with their abuser as possible. This obviously poses problems in various ways, which will be discussed. Due to our system of law, it is true that a person is innocent until proven guilty. However, in the case of rape and assault, it is not easy to obtain or provide evidence. Women must undergo long and painful procedures to produce a rape kit. Also considering the longevity of their cases, their attacker is still at large for months until the final verdict is delivered. Until better precautions and rules are put in place to protect these victims who attempt to take legal action against someone who physically raped them, these victims will remain victims regardless of the verdict. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The most important fact to understand about rape and sexual assault is that it can happen to anyone. Men and women, children and the elderly, etc. And only 6% of accusations over a 10-year period were proven by a study to be false allegations. (VCF) Rape and sexual assault are not something to be taken lightly, but those who take their attacker to court end up revealing their identity only for their attacker to go free or, in cases like Brock Turner, serves a 3 month sentence while minorities serve a life sentence. for drugs in prison. How come possession of marijuana is worth more jail time than physically abusing and violating a human being? We must ask ourselves whether the justice system is doing right by victims of rape and sexual assault, and if not, why? The Central Park Jogger case illustrates how a horrific case of rape, sodomy, and assault can somehow result in DNA evidence proving an attacker, but they are still at large. Trisha Meili was a jogger in Central Park in April 1989 when she was physically assaulted to the point of remaining in a coma for 12 days. One of the most high-profile cases of the 1980s, Trisha confirmed in her 2003 memoir about the attack that she still experienced physiological aftereffects from the attack, such as memory loss. And while in 2002 a man named Matias Reyes was convicted of the attack thanks to DNA evidence, due to the statute of limitations on when he confessed, Reyeswas not prosecuted for the attack on Meili. A woman who was found literally 4 hours after her attack, bound, gagged and covered in mud and blood, did not get justice in court. A woman who lost 80% of her blood from 5 deep wounds, suffered hypothermia, severe brain damage and class 4 hemorrhagic shock, had her name revealed just 2 days after her attack while she was still in a coma. The cruel fascination we feel with the accuser and the victim and not the accused must end. Another case to explore is that of Patricia Bowman. One who would have kept her identity secret if it hadn't been for the case revealed by those at the Boston Globe and the New York Times. The verdict in his case was not guilty. It surprised very few people after the judge rejected the testimony of three other women who also claimed that her attacker had sexually assaulted them in the 1980s. Then the jury took only an hour and 17 minutes to make his decision, without requesting any testimony or asking questions of the judge. With his attacker's notoriety as the nephew of JFK and Kennedy himself and his family's ability to hire the best lawyer money can buy with an impeccable track record, Bowman unfortunately didn't stand much of a chance at trial. His trial was a disaster because the defendant managed to sow reasonable doubt among the jury. And while it may be unfortunate, Bowman was even distrusted due to a child born out of wedlock, previous cocaine use, and three abortions she had undergone. All of this has resulted in what is at best a tainted reputation for Bowman's forward. Still a doctor, still a Kennedy, he left the case with little more than the inability to return to silent oblivion. Yet 3 women's accounts of sexual assault by him were never heard by the jury or the public. And Bowman, whose identity was revealed to the world without his consent, is still getting mail about the case, but no justice is being served. Looking at these cases, there is something that needs to be addressed. In cases of rape and sexuality, there will always be a hint of doubt. Because these cases are circumstantial and based on word of mouth, they can easily be swept under the rug and a rapist can go free. We must change the system to prevent rape and sexual assault and punish those who commit them on others. We need to change the way we prosecute and handle these cases and find a solution to ensure that the perpetrators do not get away scot-free. The victim is called a victim for a reason: she was assaulted, beaten, broken, and hurt physically and emotionally. 93% of victims leave with PTSD for the rest of their lives. They are also 10 times more likely to use hard drugs and even 33% of them consider suicide. Rape and sexual assault are not accusations that any woman or man seeking justice takes lightly. And yet, many do not get the justice they rightly deserve. These statistics show that this is a legitimate problem that should be addressed accordingly. With something as serious as rape and sexual assault, why are so many perpetrators released on DNA evidence like Matias Reyes or only serving 3 months in prison like Brock Turner? This consistently results in courts being unable to prosecute these rapists due to the terms of the trial. A victim who cannot remain anonymous in their lawsuit may think it is not worth trying. A victim who sees Brock Turner walk away virtually unscathed may think it's not worth their money and..