-
Essay / Humor in the film The Great Dictator by Charles Chaplin
Ray Bradbury said: “the only answer to much of the destruction, dishonor and dissolution of the world is a sense of humor. …So faced with totalitarian regimes and the madness they inflict on the world, courage is not enough, you have to be able to laugh in their face, turn your head back and say: “You don't count, I'm dismissing you this way I make you laugh all the time. The big laugh of acceptance that melts.” I agree with her, because using humor to draw attention to such a situation was the best way, and the best example is The Great Dictator. The Great Dictator (Charles Chaplin, “The Great Dictator”) is a comedy film in which Chaplin used humor to tell a situation or story. Chaplin forced the audience to face the Nazi reality, and it was a way of drawing attention to the rise of fascism in Europe. Comedy used to arouse sympathy, and it's the best way to attack anything that looks like a dictatorial regime, they can't stand it and people can laugh at it. Courage doesn't do it, but laughter would. Many anti-fascists made serious arguments against Hitler, but Charlie Chaplin responded to the deadly threat posed by the Nazis in a different way, using humor to emphasize the absurdity and hypocrisy of the message. On the other hand, historian Gitta Sereny, thinks that associating humor with people like Hitler and belittling them is dangerous and we should not do it, and said that Hitler was a very serious and good man , so Chaplin should not do it. I did something like The Great Dictator. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Author Robert Cole said: “When Chaplin began The Great Dictator in 1937, he was convinced that fascism was pushing Europe toward war. However, British and American opinion continues to believe that war can be avoided, in the first case by appeasing fascist dictators and in the second by following a policy of isolationism. Additionally, political propaganda remained in bad odor following its abuses during World War I, and censors on both sides of the Atlantic discouraged any overt propaganda content in films. From the start, Chaplin was under pressure either to make the images and message of his film inoffensive to Hitler and Mussolini, which meant eliminating any elements of anti-fascist propaganda, or to abandon the project altogether. Chaplin was aware of the situation at that time and understood the elements of mass persuasion and how comedy can manipulate the viewer's emotions and beliefs. Chaplin's goal was to target viewers in Germany and Italy, but especially Germany under Hitler. Chaplin understood the power of comedy and cinema designed for a mass audience. Use the barber and the dictator to represent the duality of good and evil. Chaplin painted the characters in a tedious manner so as not to misunderstand the distinction between good and evil. All of the scenes in The Great Dictator evoked so many different emotions, fear, love, hate and humor, that these emotions elaborated the central purpose of Chaplin's take. sides in the conflict of good versus evil. The movie was filled with heroes and villains who fought evil. For example, the chapter about life in the ghetto, the barber's girlfriend helping him by hitting the soldier with the pan, it's a comedy but gave us an idea of how we can distinguish the good bad. These visuals, like the chapter on life in.