Marxist communist ideology is probably one of the most misunderstood political dogmas of modern times. It is a theory in which, through the historical events and practices of his time, Karl Marx predicted the next steps towards communism in a capitalist society. This transition is discussed in detail in the first chapter of the Communist Manifesto, as Marx defines the elements of a capitalist society: the bourgeoisie, who run the factories and own vast properties, land and means of production; and the proletariat, which constitutes the majority as the working class. A capitalist society will inevitably result in class conflict [1], since “the bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most revolutionary role. » [2] The establishment of bourgeois power over society was revolutionary in its own sense. Not only did he remove the major monarchical influence that chained society, but he also removed religious influences from power. Such religious manifestations of government through the Church, for example, had hampered European society in the Middle Ages. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay In the words of the Communist Manifesto, the bourgeoisie had “put an end to all feudal, patriarchal and idyllic relations.” and “torn the heterogeneous feudal ties which united man to his “natural superiors”, and left no other link between man and man other than personal interest naked, than the insensitive “cash payment”. He drowned out the most heavenly ecstasies of humanity. religious fervor..."[3]. The role of the bourgeoisie is therefore necessary. Thanks to its capitalist aspirations, the bourgeoisie is taking major steps towards the expansion of business, the widespread creation of a greater number of products and the development of industrial monopoly.[4] The proletariat will inevitably be alienated from products and co-workers and will experience poor working conditions. These workers will become "an appendage of the machine"[5] for which they had worked. scenarios will lead to the transition to communism, as everything would be in place for a successful revolution via the proletariat. The firmly established industries that once belonged to the bourgeoisie can pave the way for an easy transition to a system based on public ownership. Gracchus Babeuf's Manifesto of Equals is of a different nature from the Manifesto of the Communist Party. He wrote before Marx, during the final stages of the French Revolution and before the expansion of industrialization. Therefore, his message was more applicable to the people of his time and was more concerned with the distribution of agricultural land. Instead of constructing a theory or ideology of political thought, Babeuf was trying to rally the French people to a revolution for equality: "The French Revolution was nothing other than a precursor of another revolution, which will be bigger, more solemn and who will be the last. » [6] Although not as detailed as the works of Karl Marx, Babeuf's writing propagates in context a very vital point: equality is the natural right of man. Even if Babeuf and Marx circulated the idea of ​​equality and the inevitability of equality. the abolition of all class hierarchies, there are many areas of divergence between these two thinkers. First, the two writers had produced their works under different pretexts. Marx wrote in the conditions of industrialization, the development of small, densely populated towns due to industrialization and. 4-5, 9-10, 128, 136, 140-142, 173-175