Established in 1948, the Indian Atomic Energy Commission turned to the United Kingdom for its initial assistance in the realization of Apsara. Subsequently, with a similar vision, the CIRUS reactor was supplied by Canada, where the heavy water came from the United States. India has built a nuclear program over the years that has led to the construction of a number of reactors. India's "peaceful nuclear explosion" in 1974 implies its hegemonic ambitions, as India has the capacity to produce around 300 to 400 nuclear weapons. India's continued modernization of its weapons could turn it into a hegemonic nuclear power that could deeply disrupt Pakistan and China. Calling into question India's stated intentions regarding nuclear testing, plutonium intended for its 1974 and 1998 tests was diverted from its "civilian" nuclear facilities. After 1974, India continued to claim that its explosion was "peaceful" and to advocate global nuclear disarmament, although it rejected Pakistan's proposals to denuclearize South Asia. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essay From Pokhran-I to Operation Shakti, India has traditionally relied on plutonium and thermonuclear technology. In 1992, the then chairman of India's Department of Atomic Energy acknowledged that India had been successful in the past in meeting its highly enriched uranium target, even though the centrifuge program faced critical technical obstacles. . Furthermore, former AEC Chairman Raja Ramanna admitted that India was striving to produce more efficient centrifuges used for military purposes. At the top of all these developments, it is important to note that thermonuclear weapons have far more destructive power than a nuclear bomb. India could also consider using its civilian reactors to increase its stockpile of weapons-grade plutonium. Robert Einhorn, a former senior State Department nonproliferation official, told the Carnegie International Nuclear Policy Conference in March that Bush administration officials had ambitions to sign a nuclear deal with India, to “work together to counter China – to counterbalance China”. an emerging China. He further expressed his view that the nuclear deal had had unfortunate repercussions as other countries had concluded that Washington was playing the role of favorite against India. India is the only country in the region with greater uranium reserves than other countries in the region. India has already received around 4,914 tonnes of uranium from France, Russia and Kazakhstan, and has agreements with Canada, Mongolia, Argentina and Namibia for additional shipments. He also signed a uranium deal with Australia which caused considerable controversy at home. This massive production of uranium each year can indirectly support its nuclear submarine program and the current rate of production of weapons-grade plutonium. These uranium reserves are sufficient for approx. 6 to 10 bombs per year. By adding a twist to the existing process of producing fissile materials, the India-US strategic partnership has completed it. Under this dangerous deal, it would continue to allow India to not only increase its fissile materials, but also its capacity to increase the production of nuclear materials. Consequently, strategic stability in South Asia has been negatively affected since the early stages due to the designs.