Animal Testing and Alternatives for Developing Cruelty-Free Makeup Grade 8 Argumentative EssayCruelty-Free Makeup: A Moral PositivityWorks CitedGrade 8 Argumentative Essay OutlineIntroductionIntroduction to the Issue of Animal Testing in the Cosmetic IndustryEthical Concerns Surrounding Animal TestingBenefits of Animal TestingArguments in Support of animal testing, including potential medical advances Counterargument that cures developed through animal testing do not always benefit humans Limitations of animal testing Anatomical differences between animals and humans Inaccuracy of test results Historical examples of animal testing ineffectiveEthical considerationsThe ability of animals to feel painThe moral implications of using animals for cosmeticsArguments against the mistreatment of animals for the benefit of humansAlternatives to animal testingThe availability of non-animal methods for testing cosmeticsChallenges posed by countries with mandatory animal testing lawsCall for actionEncouraging consumers to support cruelty-free cosmeticsAdvocating for changes in laws and regulations regarding animal testing in the cosmetics industry Argumentative Essay Example 8th gradeCruelty-free makeup: moral positivityMany people don't realize how many animals are killed each year in the cosmetic industries. Each year, more than 100 million animals are tested in the United States, and the number of companies that conduct animal testing is increasing; Alternatively, many have joined together in an effort to put an end to animal testing as well. Many people think that animal testing could allow us to provide new products, but animal testing for cosmetics should be banned because animals have a different anatomy than the human body and animals can feel discomfort. pain when we put them through these tests, but the most important part is that we don't need to sacrifice the lives of animals for something useless like makeup when there are alternatives to develop a cruelty-free makeup. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Researchers believe that animal testing allows them to collect data that will make improvements in people's lives. Without animal testing, we may not have the treatments and cures we have today. This is not to say that I agree with using animals to improve our lives, but rather disagree that animals are not there for us to use as objects of research. Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that in many cases cures have been developed only for animals, showing that these tests are not that beneficial either. Animals share similar genetics, but they have different anatomy that could make animal testing less effective. Due to these issues, many test results cannot be accurate. Helen Martson, author of “Is Animal Testing Necessary?”for advanced medical research? » states in his article that “the human body – and indeed most living systems – is extremely complex. This complexity and complexity is precisely why animals are not good models for human medicine. “Humans who differ from other animals are not good models for human medicine” (Marston). Test data is unreliable because we do not actually test on the human body. There are many examples that show how products developed through animal testing have had no effect. In her argument, she gives an example where she says that "medical advances should be weighed against the delays and tragedies caused by the use of animal testing - the thalidomide disaster which caused tens of thousands to be born of children with serious malformations not expected in animals. tests” (Marston). There have been cases where these experiments have not been affecting humans, and animal tests may not give the same result when tested on the human body. Therefore, animal tests that give inaccurate results are unnecessary and, in the interests of the animals, should be abolished. If we are capable of feeling pain, animals are no different, and when animal tests are performed on them, we treat them as they cannot feel pain like us. As Giorgia Della Rocca, author of “Diagnosis of Pain in Small Companion Animals” states in her article: “Animals are capable of feeling pain in the same way as humans. Acute and/or chronic pain is associated not only with many surgical procedures, but also with various medical illnesses, where pain can increase morbidity and mortality” (Rocca 58). In many companies, animals are given no pain medication and different chemicals are injected into the animal's eyes or rubbed into its shaved skin. I'm sure many of us wouldn't use makeup if we saw how animals are treated every day in the cosmetics manufacturing process. Animals can feel pain just like we feel pain. Would you do such a horrible action just to get the mascara that gives you the longest eyelashes? I hope not and I wish many of us would stick to cruelty-free makeup products. We sacrifice animals for our own benefit. What did the animals do to us that we took their lives like that? For example, in the book Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat Linda, an English professor whose writings focus on inequality and oppression, states: "I don't believe that the lives of human beings has more value than that of others. animals. But the mice? (Hezorg 234). Many of us would agree that mice are disgusting and we would kill them if we found them in our house, although I disagree that animals have the right to live freely in their natural habitat. It's just not right to raise them and do all kinds of procedures on them, causing them to die or just kill them. They were not definitely created for this life, and we must do everything we can to put an end to these acts. Many cosmetic companies are cruelty-free, and if they are able to make their products without animal testing, I see no reason why any other company should continue to test on animals. There are tons of makeup companies that don't use animal testing. for their./

Essay / Animal Testing and Alternatives for Developing Cruelty-Free Makeup Grade 8 Argumentative EssayCruelty-Free Makeup: A Moral PositivityWorks CitedGrade 8 Argumentative Essay OutlineIntroductionIntroduction to the Issue of Animal Testing in the Cosmetic IndustryEthical Concerns Surrounding Animal TestingBenefits of Animal TestingArguments in Support of animal testing, including potential medical advances Counterargument that cures developed through animal testing do not always benefit humans Limitations of animal testing Anatomical differences between animals and humans Inaccuracy of test results Historical examples of animal testing ineffectiveEthical considerationsThe ability of animals to feel painThe moral implications of using animals for cosmeticsArguments against the mistreatment of animals for the benefit of humansAlternatives to animal testingThe availability of non-animal methods for testing cosmeticsChallenges posed by countries with mandatory animal testing lawsCall for actionEncouraging consumers to support cruelty-free cosmeticsAdvocating for changes in laws and regulations regarding animal testing in the cosmetics industry Argumentative Essay Example 8th gradeCruelty-free makeup: moral positivityMany people don't realize how many animals are killed each year in the cosmetic industries. Each year, more than 100 million animals are tested in the United States, and the number of companies that conduct animal testing is increasing; Alternatively, many have joined together in an effort to put an end to animal testing as well. Many people think that animal testing could allow us to provide new products, but animal testing for cosmetics should be banned because animals have a different anatomy than the human body and animals can feel discomfort. pain when we put them through these tests, but the most important part is that we don't need to sacrifice the lives of animals for something useless like makeup when there are alternatives to develop a cruelty-free makeup. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Researchers believe that animal testing allows them to collect data that will make improvements in people's lives. Without animal testing, we may not have the treatments and cures we have today. This is not to say that I agree with using animals to improve our lives, but rather disagree that animals are not there for us to use as objects of research. Those unfamiliar with this school of thought may be interested to know that in many cases cures have been developed only for animals, showing that these tests are not that beneficial either. Animals share similar genetics, but they have different anatomy that could make animal testing less effective. Due to these issues, many test results cannot be accurate. Helen Martson, author of “Is Animal Testing Necessary?”for advanced medical research? » states in his article that “the human body – and indeed most living systems – is extremely complex. This complexity and complexity is precisely why animals are not good models for human medicine. “Humans who differ from other animals are not good models for human medicine” (Marston). Test data is unreliable because we do not actually test on the human body. There are many examples that show how products developed through animal testing have had no effect. In her argument, she gives an example where she says that "medical advances should be weighed against the delays and tragedies caused by the use of animal testing - the thalidomide disaster which caused tens of thousands to be born of children with serious malformations not expected in animals. tests” (Marston). There have been cases where these experiments have not been affecting humans, and animal tests may not give the same result when tested on the human body. Therefore, animal tests that give inaccurate results are unnecessary and, in the interests of the animals, should be abolished. If we are capable of feeling pain, animals are no different, and when animal tests are performed on them, we treat them as they cannot feel pain like us. As Giorgia Della Rocca, author of “Diagnosis of Pain in Small Companion Animals” states in her article: “Animals are capable of feeling pain in the same way as humans. Acute and/or chronic pain is associated not only with many surgical procedures, but also with various medical illnesses, where pain can increase morbidity and mortality” (Rocca 58). In many companies, animals are given no pain medication and different chemicals are injected into the animal's eyes or rubbed into its shaved skin. I'm sure many of us wouldn't use makeup if we saw how animals are treated every day in the cosmetics manufacturing process. Animals can feel pain just like we feel pain. Would you do such a horrible action just to get the mascara that gives you the longest eyelashes? I hope not and I wish many of us would stick to cruelty-free makeup products. We sacrifice animals for our own benefit. What did the animals do to us that we took their lives like that? For example, in the book Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat Linda, an English professor whose writings focus on inequality and oppression, states: "I don't believe that the lives of human beings has more value than that of others. animals. But the mice? (Hezorg 234). Many of us would agree that mice are disgusting and we would kill them if we found them in our house, although I disagree that animals have the right to live freely in their natural habitat. It's just not right to raise them and do all kinds of procedures on them, causing them to die or just kill them. They were not definitely created for this life, and we must do everything we can to put an end to these acts. Many cosmetic companies are cruelty-free, and if they are able to make their products without animal testing, I see no reason why any other company should continue to test on animals. There are tons of makeup companies that don't use animal testing. for their./

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch