Hunting: a controversial tradition A tradition practiced since the beginning of humanity is now questioned by many as to whether it is still necessary in our modern society. world. This long-standing human tradition is hunting. Many questions have arisen in recent years as a result of this controversy over whether hunting is humane and ethical for the animals or whether it actually helps the environment. There are many different positions on this argument, but I will present the best arguments that I have found throughout my research on this topic. In the article "Hunting is Crucial to Conservation", Dr. Richard Emslie and Dr. Michael H. Knight argue that the animal ecosystems of African game parks would actually be worse off without trophy hunting and hunting. in general. In fact, this claim was backed up by the support of Prince William of the United Kingdom. Others, however, believe that hunting and trophy hunting actually cause damage to animal ecosystems. Canadian academic David Suzuki discusses this in his article “Grizzly bear trophy hunting is a sport like dogfighting.” Mr. Suzuki takes a stand against trophy hunting, focusing on the problems it causes in British Columbia. He says: “I'm not against hunting, and many who oppose trophy hunting agree that sustainable hunting can be a good way to put food on the table. But shooting an animal – often on its way to feed and therefore an easy target – simply to hang its head on the wall or place its skin on the ground is not hunting. “It’s killing for fun” (2016). Although hunting can cause harm to animals and natural ecosystems when done illegally and abused by poachers, it can bring great benefits to humans and even animals when done correctly. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay Hunting, when done inappropriately, can cause irreparable damage to ecosystems and even lead to extinction of endangered animals. An example of this can be found in the Canadian territory of British Columbia. There has been much controversy over the apparent failure of the British Colombian government to impose bans on trophy hunting in the Great Bear Rainforest. This controversy is the premise of the aforementioned article by David Suzuki. He states that “the British Columbia government has never recognized the ban on coastal First Nations trophy hunting in the Great Bear Rainforest” (2016). This is of great concern, as killing these bears for the sole purpose of obtaining a trophy to take home endangers their species and could deprive future generations of the opportunity to admire bears in their natural habitat. Mr. Suzuki also claims that "bears eat salmon and drag the carcasses into the forest, providing food for other animals, such as eagles, and fertilizer for the huge rainforest trees" ( 2016). Due to the important role of these bears in British Columbia's ecosystem, the extinction or decline of bear populations would result in a drastic change in British Columbia's ecosystem. This issue is a perfect example of how a government that does not enforce its animal conservation laws can lead to inappropriate hunting practices, which in turn.