-
Essay / Satyam Company Scandal Analysis
Company ProfileSatyam Computer Services Limited (Satyam) was incorporated on June 24, 1987 in Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) by B. Ramalinga Raju and was a leading global consulting and IT administration. In a short period of time, the organization grew from a negligible residential IT administration organization to a global IT consulting organization. The company started with 20 employees and quickly grew into a “global” company. It offers IT and business services reappropriating administrations spread across different territories. Satyam, for example, was “India’s growing victory”. Satyam has won several awards in advancement, administration and corporate responsibility. "In 2007, Ernst and Young awarded Mr. Raju the "Entrepreneur of the Year" award. On April 14, 2008, Satyam won honors from MZ Consult for being "a leader in India in CG and liability ". In September 2008, the Global Council for Corporate Governance awarded Satyam the "Global Peacock Award" for global greatness in corporate responsibility. In 2003, Satyam's IT administration organizations included 13,120 specialist partners overhauling over 300 clients across the world From 2003 to 2008, in almost every financial indicator of interest to investors, the company achieved measurable growth of 467 million. dollars By 2008, the organization had grown to $2.1 billion. The organization illustrated “a compound annual growth rate of 35% over this period.” . Earnings per share developed comparably, from $0. 12 to $0. 62, at a compound annual development rate of 40%. Over a similar period (2003-2009), the company traded at an average current EBITDA of 15.36. Finally, from January 2003, at an offer price of INR 138.08, Satyam's stock would reach INR 526.25 — a 300% change in the offer cost after almost five years. Satyam has clearly produced enormous business development and investor value. The organization was a main star (and unmistakable name) in a global IT trading center. The external conditions in which Satyam worked were certainly helpful to the development of the organization. Either way, the numbers don't reflect the whole picture. Satyam's example of accounting misrepresentation has been called "India's Enron". Say no to plagiarism. Get Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get Original EssayCaseIt was perhaps the biggest corporate extortion situation in India where Satyam Computer Services Limited made the misfortune financial specialists up to $1. 5 billion. The misrepresentation was executed by blowing up the organization's revenues through false transaction solicitations and demonstrating that the gains obtained from producing the bank proclamations were in keeping with the scheme of the organization's statutory and internal auditors. . The annual budget explanations of the organization with increased income were distributed for a fairly long period, which led to an increase in the price of certificates in the market. All this time, honest financial specialists were attracted to invest resources in the organization. Attempts were made to cover up the extortion by winning over friends and relatives organizations. In 1991-92, Satyam PCs was registered with the BSE (Bombay Stock Exchange) and in 2001, it was registered with the NYSE (New YorkStock Exchange). Satyam Computers was one of the fastest developing organizations of India and hence Satyam Computers and Ramalinga Raju achieved many honors during its years of development. During a similar period, real estate was booming and hence Raju was attracted towards land advertising. The property rates in Hyderabad were changing rapidly, so Raju began aggressively purchasing the landed properties in Hyderabad and neighboring territories. Due to forced purchase of properties, Raju was short of assets (cash), so to create more finances, he started controlling the money-related joints of Satyam Computers. For example, if Satyam had the real profit of Rs60 crores, then in money related proclamations, Raju used to demonstrate the profit of Rs600 crores in order to demonstrate that Satyam is becoming fast. As a result of this deceptively rapid development and deceptively strong financial data, the cost of Satyam's offering was changing rapidly. Raju and his brother were offering Satyam's shares on the 7th at this high price in order to raise the money needed to purchase properties. Raju opened 365 new organizations to purchase the properties. He purchased the properties in the name of his relatives, relatives, companions, etc. Raju used to appoint his farm laborers (whose monthly salary did not exceed Rs 5,000) directors of his newly opened organizations and purchased the properties under their names. Raju's plan was that the rates of the properties would increase after some time after which he would offer these properties and from the money earned he would adjust the hole he had made in Satyam's monetary explanations. Due to the 2008 recession, property prices declined drastically and Raju's arrangements of selling properties at high rates fizzled. Raju was in a bad position and to escape from it, he came up with another plan. As this new project indicates, Satyam will buy the two organizations Maytas Properties and Maytas Infra (the two organizations close to Raju). They will buy the organizations on paper but in reality there will be no exchange of money in order to adjust the false figures and the real figures in Satyam's records. The governing body of Satyam confirmed the arrangement on December 16, 2008 and without obtaining shareholders' consent, Raju authorized the arrangement. However, the shareholders of Satyam were not happy and due to this charge cost of Satyam decreased. A financial specialist from the United States registered a lawsuit against Satyam, following which the price of Satyam was reduced by approximately 55% on the NYSE. Due to the growing investor clout on Raju, he abandoned the plan to buy the Maytas Infra and Maytas properties. It was the last chance for Raju to fill the gap between the real and fake figures of Satyam and stop this discovery trick, but seeing that it failed, on January 8, 2009, he admitted to SEBI that he controlled Satyam's money-related joints and on January 9, 2009, Raju and his brother were arrested. After this trick, the government selected a new board of directors for Satyam. In April 2009, Tech Mahindra bought out Satyam Computers' 51% holdings and named it Mahindra Satyam. Finally, in June 2013, Mahindra Satyam converged into Tech Mahindra. After the trick was discovered, Satyam's stock dropped from Rs170 to Rs6. 50 due to which its investors suffered a loss of nearly Rs 14,162 crore. LIC was an institutional speculator in Satyam and suffered a colossal loss of Rs950 crore. The meaning of the word Satyam in Sanskrit is “Truth”. Anyway, Satyam's taskshad no reality. To acquire the money, Raju carried out many illegal activities such as money laundering, insider trading and accounting extortion, due to which many core speculators of Satyam endured considerable measures. 10 Consequences of the Satyam scandal Satyam has shaken Indian businesses and exposed many worrying realities regarding the deficiencies in the country's business administration indicators. The administration responded to this misrepresentation by updating the administrative system, with the new Companies Law of 2013, which regulates the responsibilities of the assessor and free directors, among other changes. In 2014, market controller Sebi amended Rule 49 of the Disclosure Rules to improve the administration of the company. There is no doubt that boards of directors and review committees of organizations have extensive oversight forces over corporate administration. Boards of directors must have something like a female director. SCSL's stock prices fell further, creating panic among its financiers, shareholders, customers, employees and the government. To prevent further loss of stakeholder money and damage to customer and employee interests, the Indian government intervened by dissolving the board on January 6, 2009 and appointing its own directors to stop further siphoning money and restore the situation. . In 2009, the Confederation of Indian Industry set up a team led by former bureau secretary Naresh Chandra to recommend changes. Taking into account the proposals of this team, the Ministry of Enterprise published voluntary guidelines for corporate governance in 2009. The National Association of Software and Services Companies further established a panel of administration and of corporate morality. This committee proposed changes related to review advisory groups, investor rights, and the shout-monger strategy. The Companies Act 1956 was repealed with the new Companies Act 2013 (the Act). The new law has made an unmistakable takeoff compared to the old law and has obtained some estimates that should benefit the larger network of partners, with the subsequent increase in consistency costs for the organization. The law considers financial misrepresentation a criminal offense. It sets out clear commitments regarding the publicity of extortion cases to valuers, cost accountants and friends' secretaries. It obviously describes the duty and responsibility of auditors, who are counted on to take on more dynamic work. Balanced governance intended to ensure proper management and management of the organization requires hitherto inactive on-screen characters to take up much-needed work, in light of legitimate concern for investors, banks, traders , customers and the company's various partners. organization.In April 2014, SEBI corrected the listing agreement to incorporate provisions identifying the foundation of a due diligence instrument, the work of the audit committee in case of suspected misrepresentation or inconsistency, and the work from the CEO and the CFO regarding money. related details and disclosure to the audit committee. In 2015, SEBI surrounded the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“LODR”), applicable to every registered organization, and incorporated strict rules identifying the detail/exposure of material events and the actual and alleged extortion..