This is the first draft of my research paper on how sexual harassment is perceived and how certain varying perceptions affect victims of sexual harassment. Finding digital sources was quite easy compared to finding print sources, because there was much more relevant and current information that I could find online rather than on a shelf. I hope that the question I attempted to answer and the topic were neither too broad nor too narrow and that the conclusions drawn from my research were adequate for a first draft of this article. My biggest goal for this article is to write enough that I can meet the minimum page limit without being redundant and write a satisfying conclusion. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay In the 20th and 21st centuries, sexual harassment is becoming an issue gaining attention in workplaces and educational institutions. However, there are different perceptions about what legitimately constitutes sexual harassment and how these differing views affect victims of sexual harassment in unique ways. Although a single definition of sexual harassment is still lacking due to varying judicial, professional, and even cultural perceptions of what constitutes sexual harassment, a commonly accepted definition of sexual harassment describes it as "unwanted and unwelcome sexual behavior in a working environment. or an educational setting affecting both a person’s physical and psychological well-being” (Mamaru 29). But this definition results in some victims of sexual harassment being fired because their experiences may not have been as physically or psychologically traumatic and therefore such cases do not truly constitute sexual harassment. Due to the lack of a single, clear definition due to a number of diverse perceptions, the experiences of victims of sexual harassment are often invalidated, ignored or dismissed even by the victims themselves. consistent and meaningful definition of sexual harassment in court decisions, allowing a victim to express their concerns when confronted with harassment in a professional or educational establishment. In What Should a Reasonable Woman Do? In The Judicial Rhetoric of Sexual Harassment, written by Professor Frances J. Ranney of Wayne State University, she examines two concepts specific to hostile environment claims in sexual harassment law, the "reasonable woman" standard of review. and the legal category of “welcome harassment.” "In this text, I did not find any consistent statement about what sexual harassment was, but rather the outcome of the case was determined by facts specific to the sexual harassment case. Although it may seem reasonable, it is obvious that the courts ruled against the victim due to a vague and too narrow definition of sexual harassment One such case of "welcome harassment" occurred in 1994, in the. The case of Carr v. Allison Gas Turbine Division, where the sexual harassment claim at the trial court level was dismissed by Mary Carr, who was the first and only female tinsmith at her workplace who ultimately resigned afterward. five years in the tinsmith workshop She had claimed that she was frequently addressed to her colleagues with “obscene epithets ∴ she had posted signs and posters with character. 231).