-
Essay / Errors on the subject of immigration
The opposing views between liberals and conservatives constitute a never-ending debate in itself. One side supports positive things to say on the subject while the other side has mostly negative and constructive points. Depending on which part of the spectrum one falls on, they will use an error to analyze other opinions, as well as their own, on immigration. The left wing is more open-minded on the subject of immigration and its policies, while the left wing tends to be more conservative and proud of the pre-existing immigration system. There are misconceptions on both sides of the spectrum, as immigration-related situations show. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Hasty generalization is commonly used by the public when it comes to forming an opinion on a certain topic of discussion. This type of error occurs when one makes a hypothesis without credible evidence and draws conclusions and opinions without doing research. Whether it is someone, something, or a situation, opposing viewpoints are neither considered nor seen. Many commoners assume, without any prior knowledge, that foreigners come here to take but do not give back to the system in return. President Trump is being criticized for his use of sweeping generalizations specifically targeting followers of Islam and those who in the past have posed a threat to the country's security. President Trump generalized all Muslim Americans by clearly stating that "if Muslim extremists have brought some of the terror to this country, we should ban all Muslims from entering." This quote cited by Bruno in his article highlighting all the times Trump has used fallacies is a perfect example of hasty generalization because it places the use of fallacies in a real-life situation. Trump, as previously defined, targets a certain ethnicity and makes assumptions without using logic. Using this kind of fallacy against someone or something in a speech or conversation or simply expressing one's opinions can come across as racist and often misunderstood. Immigration is one of the topics where people jump to conclusions without doing research and without having enough reliable evidence to support their opinions. To compensate for this, the public tends to generalize. This theme ties into my next topic about haste and ignorance when assessing or meeting immigrants for the first time. Foreigners will take away jobs, the most common misconception about immigration. Another Hasty example is generalization. It is a mistake to assume without knowing the group of people who are the subject of this conversation. Not all migrant families and skilled workers come here to take jobs, some actually create them. This hypothesis is also another example of hasty generalization, as it is not based on any credible research and draws ignorant conclusions. In fact, Williams, whose work is published by Gale, a Cengage company, states that "while some may come to this country to escape danger, others seek the purpose of doing business and have a better chance of get a higher salary. work than elsewhere. Many migrants are here only to work, whether on rich, fertile land, or to fill technologically advanced positions, including jobs related to computer technology.” Williams supports the view that not all immigrants are there to take jobs, but.