This statement by President Bush on the position of the September 11 attacks, an elaborate democracy is at odds with terrorism, for the reason that freedom and fear in this quote are like freedom in the means of democracy as well as fear in the means of terrorism are considered meanings for democracy and terrorism. They both eliminate each other, which shows that only some can win from both, namely democracy and terrorism. The strategy of the United States of America after the September 11 attacks is based on the impression that democracy diminishes and minimizes terrorism. Then, disagreement leads to states as well as nations like Afghanistan and Iraq being transformed into republics. Nevertheless, does democracy really reduce the possibilities and scope of terrorism and do democracies and republics become a minor target of the existence of terrorists compared to non-democratic states and clarifies that what happens to a regime or to a democratic state is then targeted. by terrorists? The fundamental question that arises is whether the core values ​​of democracy tend to be more important and less necessary in these types of consequences, as well as how to overcome and confront all this. These are thought-provoking and applicable questions, because democracy is central to the values ​​of the Western domain. It is therefore vital to get closer to the role of democracy and terrorism. The goal is to gain an understandable concept and model about terrorism and the role of democracy, or to appeal to the broader political meanings of terrorism. Central Research Question: The central research question of the research paper is: the incident of... ... middle of paper ...... especially as the laws are being strained by anti-terrorism regulations because it is not possible to differentiate between crime, misdemeanors and acts of violence and the second means is downstream due to the impossibility of discriminating between crime and slight turbulence of the community. Equivalence is faced with the fact that states are not able to treat minorities belonging to other states or neighboring states as well as any other beliefs in the same way as they treat their own citizens, while the The effectiveness is called into question by the costs of a huge amount of capital for backup. the inhabitant as well as for their safety because they are protected from imminent violence and deprived of perfect information on the effectiveness of this type of action. All this therefore represents the haubrich view that the fundamental values ​​of democratic states are affected by terrorism..