-
Essay / Why performance-enhancing drugs should be banned at all levels of sport
Performance-enhancing drugs have existed in sport for centuries, which has inevitably had consequences for the health of athletes and the industry sports. The sport has been directly linked to the use of performance-enhancing agents since the first Olympic Games in Greece, a spectacle that took place between 776 and 393 BC. Performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) have become a public issue since their ban in most sports, but have continued to be used widely, impacting the sports industry, physical health and well-being psychology of athletes who use performance-enhancing drugs. Performance-enhancing drugs have led to higher performance levels in athletes, increasing the entertainment factor at the professional level, but have also damaged the ethics of sport. Users experience physical health changes that are both positive and negative, with some changes being permanent and irreversible. From a psychological perspective, the effects of performance-enhancing drugs can be considered appropriate in very limited types of situations, however, the consequences of long-term use have been shown to be detrimental to the mental health of users. Performance enhancing substances have been used in sports to enhance an athlete's strength and speed, which increases their overall performance but consequently harms the essence of the sport and is dangerous to the physical and mental health of users and must therefore be prohibited at all levels. sport. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay. Performance-enhancing drugs are used in sports to improve the performance of athletes. As elite athletes use performance-enhancing drugs, the entertainment factor of watching live sporting events would increase, as it allows athletes to unlock a new level of potential. There are also cases in which the non-use of performance enhancing drugs by athletes could cause them to refrain from participating in serious competitions. An extremely competitive sport such as professional bodybuilding requires constant muscle growth from athletes. An athlete who participates in professional bodybuilding activities has almost no choice but to resort to performance-enhancing substances if he wishes to compete. It was stated, adding all quotes, "Many people involved in bodybuilding competitions believe they cannot compete without using steroids in order to reach what they describe as their potential." Therefore, in this case, performance-enhancing drugs may be perceived as necessary. Allowing elite athletes to use performance-enhancing drugs could significantly increase entertainment at live sporting events such as rugby, basketball, boxing and football. Fost (2005) suggests that the concept that performance-enhancing drugs provide an unfair advantage presents no consistent evidence or argument to support it. He adds: “What is fairer, the use of a team of sports specialists or a simple pill? What is the difference between training at altitude and taking erythropoietin to achieve a similar effect? Legalizing PEDs in sports can increase the entertainment factor. however, thiswould result in sport losing its spirit of fairness and becoming a competition for access to the best substances; as well as providing negative role models to children and adolescents. For centuries, the spirit of sport has evolved around “ethics, fair play and honesty” (Murofushi, 2014) and legalizing steroid use would eradicate these values from sport. Since their introduction into elite sport, the former president of the World Anti-Doping Agency, Richard Pound, believes that PEDs have been used not to ensure fairness to the user, but to provide a physically unfair advantage in the hope that their use is unknown. The revelation of its unfair nature was first recognized when "the International Amateur Athletic Federation (IAAF) became the first organization to ban the use of performance-enhancing drugs." The ban first by the IAAF in 1928 and by other organizations subsequently was intended to ensure that the sport would remain a challenge of talent and skill, as well as a test of dedication and character. 'athlete. If organizations decide to legalize the use of performance-enhancing drugs, "sporting events would increasingly become tests of rivals' access to good pharmaceutical technology" (Dixon, 2008) rather than skills or abilities. in sports. If the use of performance-enhancing drugs became more prevalent in sports leagues, fans and viewers of professional sports would perceive that the role of skill is being replaced by the substances and would therefore lose interest in the sport, which would financially harm the sports leagues and competitions. It is widely believed that young athletes emulate elite professionals. Richard Schwab believes that steroid use by professional athletes will lead young athletes to assume that PEDs are safe to use and that it is part of the life of an elite athlete. In order to maintain the classic values of sport and ensure that young athletes do not perceive drug use as normal behavior, the use of performance-enhancing drugs in sport must be prohibited. Performance-enhancing drugs cause physical changes in the body, athletes use performance-enhancing substances. they enhance medications to achieve positive benefits while perhaps ignoring the large number of negative effects on their physical health. Performance-enhancing substances provide physical benefits to the user but also pose risks to physical well-being. Athletes use PEDs in order to utilize their effect of increasing exercise capacity, allowing athletes to endure excessively large amounts of resistance training as well as cardiovascular exercise, resulting in increased lung capacity , overall strength, muscle mass and density. Athletes also use the effects of performance-enhancing drugs to combat injuries and speed up the injury healing process. In 2004, a group of anonymous scientists selected 12 websites and published an anonymous survey of PED users. The survey results showed that over 75% of survey participants were non-professional athletes (Evans and Parkinson, 2006). This indicates that the main purpose of steroid use is aesthetics. Most people who exercise regularly for extended periods of time have difficulty achieving the body aesthetic they desire due to genetic disadvantages. Research,.