(quoted from Moran, 2004, p 252) identified a model of group cohesion to better show its relationships. In this model, group cohesion can be either group integration, which represents a member's perception of attachment to the group, or an individual attraction to the group, that is, what makes him stays in the group. Each of these could be a form of task or social cohesion. Task cohesion is about members being goal-oriented and working together for a common outcome, while social cohesion is about the extent to which members like each other and enjoy being with others and ensuring that you get what you wanted. When these are integrated into the model, team cohesion can be considered multidimensional in four different parts: group integration task (GI-T), group social integration (GI-S), individual attraction to group task (ATG-T). ) and individual attractions towards the social group (ATG-S). Team cohesion can be measured directly and indirectly. In the direct method, players are asked how much they like each team member and the points are added up to give a score. This method is rarely used because the indirect method gives a better idea of ​​the level of cohesion, by asking each player if they like playing with the team and if the team plays as a team.