The speech is an essential element for presidential candidates to obtain the votes of citizens. How an individual verbalizes and expresses their thoughts and ideas can be a critical part of allowing voters to decide whether the presidential candidate is competent enough to lead an entire country. Words have an impact since they can greatly affect people, mainly when used on a big stage. Hilary Clinton and Donald Trump faced off in their second televised debate in 2016. However, during their second televised debate, logical fallacies emerged in Donald Trump's debate against Hilary Clinton. The logical fallacy that two wrongs don't make a right is present in Donald Trump's assertions about his comments: "I'm just starting to embrace them." It's like a magnet. Kiss yourself. I don't even wait. And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything” (Forbes). The public called his remarks an implication of sexual assault against women. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay Asked about his comment during the debate, Donald Trump responded: “That was locker room talk. I'm not proud of it. I'm a person who has great respect for people, for my family, for the people of this country... But it's something that happened. If you look at Bill Clinton, [what he did was] much worse. Mine are words, and his are actions. This is what he did to women. There has never been anyone in the political history of this country who has been more violent toward women…Bill Clinton has been violent toward women” (New York Times). Donald Trump attacks the wife of his challenger, Bill Clinton, by discussing his history with women, notably the scandal involving "President Bill Clinton, 49, and Monica Lewinsky, White House intern, 22 » (New York Daily News). Instead of responding to the disagreement imposed on him over his comments about how he treats women, Donald Trump claims that if Bill Clinton did something similar or worse, his actions compared to Clinton's would not be not so bad in retrospect. comparison with another individual or circumstance does not automatically classify it because both wrongs constitute a logical fallacy, a comparison is only sensible if and only if the action can be rationalized and justified without depending on a comparison for reinforce the argument in question. However, with the statements Donald Trump made during the presidential debate, he is using former President Bill Clinton's past transgressions to defend, and almost excuse, his behavior. Essentially, Trump insists that he should be absolved of the inappropriate conduct in which he was involved. Additionally, his actions seem somewhat comparable to those of Bill Clinton towards Monica Lewinsky. Both wrongs do not constitute a legitimate wrong because the past behavior of an individual or group of individuals does not change the justifiable or unjustifiable nature of another individual's actions. Ultimately, what validates a person's conduct lies in the ethics behind their actions. If someone participates in an activity classified as immoral or inconsiderate, it is still not justified, even if someone has done the same thing in the past. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. .Get a Trial.