Table of contents “Ransom” and “Invictus”: a comparisonThe anger of revengeThe redemption of forgivenessThe triumph of reconciliationThe universal messageConclusionReferencesThe novels and films with which we relate We engage often reflect complex facets of human nature, particularly themes of revenge and redemption. David Malouf's "Ransom" and Clint Eastwood's "Invictus" delve into the human psyche, highlighting the futility of revenge and the transformative power of forgiveness. In this comparative essay, we will explore how both works depict the consequences of seeking revenge and, more importantly, the profound impact of choosing forgiveness. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the Original Essay “Ransom” and “Invictus”: A ComparisonThe Wrath of VengeanceThe concept of revenge, an act of causing harm or of suffering in exchange for perceived wrongs, takes center stage in "Ransom" and "Invictus". Malouf's novel introduces us to the Greek hero Achilles, consumed by the desire for revenge after the death of his beloved friend Patroclus. Achilles' rage spirals out of control, demonstrating how revenge can lead to a destructive cycle, as each act of vengeance only fuels his anger further. His inability to find comfort in revenge highlights his futility. Achilles, a character whose name itself has become synonymous with anger and vengeance, is emblematic of the destructive power of revenge. As Patroclus falls in battle, Achilles is consumed by the burning desire to avenge his friend's death. The intensity of his fury is palpable, and Malouf skillfully expresses it through evocative language: "He could feel his soul changing color." This visceral transformation of his being underlines the emotional upheaval that revenge inflicts on the avenger. Likewise, “Invictus” explores the consequences of apartheid in South Africa, where Nelson Mandela, played by Morgan Freeman, assumed the presidency. Mandela, a former political prisoner, is faced with the choice between taking revenge on those who imprisoned him or seeking reconciliation. Eastwood's description of violent clashes between black and white South Africans highlights the destructive nature of revenge. Past wounds cannot heal when revenge is the guiding principle. The Redemption of Forgiveness Although both works explore the dangers of revenge, they also emphasize the redemptive power of forgiveness. In “Ransom,” Malouf introduces the character Somax, who teaches a crucial lesson about forgiveness to King Priam. Somax shares his own tragic story, revealing his initial impulse to harm his beloved mule, Beauty, out of anger. However, he instead chose forgiveness, hugging the mule. This act of compassion allowed him to move beyond his rage, highlighting the potential for healing through forgiveness. Somax's story is a poignant reminder that forgiveness is not a sign of weakness but a source of strength. His words resonate with readers, highlighting the transformative nature of choosing forgiveness over revenge. As Somax says: “But what good would that have done? » This rhetorical question challenges the idea that revenge can truly satisfy rage. This encourages us to consider the hollowness of revenge as a solution to our inner troubles. In contrast, “Invictus” places forgiveness at the forefront of its narrative. Nelson Mandela's decision not to seek revenge on his oppressors is a pivotal moment in the film. He understands that forgiveness frees the soul,, 28(4), 3-15.