People all over the United States are aware of not texting and driving because of the danger it poses to you and other drivers , but drivers still do it. Recently, an article published by The Arizona Republic wrote that Doug Ducey passed a bill banning statewide texting and driving in Arizona. This bill has been introduced in the past but has been rejected so far. The death of a police officer caused by the practice led lawmakers to re-propose the bill, and it was successful. This essay attempts to answer the following questions: Texting and driving in San Luis can pose a threat to you and other drivers, but to what extent? How problematic do you think texting and driving is in San Luis, Arizona? Banning texting and driving in San Luis will not be necessary as this situation is not a major problem, it will not be effective in preventing this practice and drivers can be aware of texting threats and driving. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay Given that teenagers are the target of all texting and driving situations, why would a portion of them participate in this practice? Dr. Jess P. Shatkin, a child and adolescent psychiatrist and pediatrician, says that "adolescents are wired to engage in risky behaviors [even though they] usually don't intend to get into trouble." Shatkin explains that teens think they're invincible, so they're likely to text and drive because of their dopamine. The reason the reward center activates is due to non-family peers, such as friends. Peer pressure placed on a teen driver can increase the likelihood that they will text and drive, becoming a threat to other drivers and pedestrians as well. The teen knows he can cause trouble and get into trouble if he texts while driving, but being socially accepted by his peers can discourage safety. Millennials, on the other hand, are different, they are more responsible by not giving in to peer pressure to text and drive, which is good news. Teenagers are the ones who often text and drive, but millennials may outnumber them. According to Gail B. Stewart's book on distracted driving, she presents a survey by AT&T that reveals that 49% of adults (millennials in this case) think that texting and driving is bad, even if 'they are hypocrites and do it anyway. One statistic, however, shows that 68 percent of men and 32 percent of women text and drive in the United States; 79% of millennials outperform Generation X (15%) and baby boomers (6%) thanks to this practice. This reason may be a guess, but perhaps both of these generations trust their ability to drive while texting. Based on some observations, these drivers are confident in their ability to text and drive, so they are confident in their well-being during the ride. This may not be the case for most of them because they are worried about the consequences of this practice. A survey confirms this lack of trust, as 22 out of 27 respondents do not trust themselves to text and drive because it is dangerous. Even though I barely know how to drive, I don't trust myself totexting and driving because I believe I wouldn't be skilled enough to text and drive because I don't want to get hurt or leave life. It would seem unusual, even ridiculous, to say that texting while driving is not a problem given that most of the United States has statewide bans. Addiction to smartphones encourages drivers, for certain reasons, to use them while driving. Finally, driving can be quite scary and losing concentration on the road can create problems for you and other drivers. It's fair to point out that before the statewide ban, Arizona lawmakers targeted bans at specific cities like Phoenix and Tucson, not San Luis. The same can be said with other US states, as the situation may be worse than in other cities within a state. San Luis is a small city, which means there aren't a lot of car accidents like big cities in Arizona. There may be driving errors, such as blocking other drivers when swerving at an intersection or driving at speed. These errors can lead to near misses or possibly an accident. However, there aren't many texting while driving accidents that have happened or will happen in the city. Based on my experiences, the news, and my peers, most car accidents in San Luis are caused by drunk driving, which occurs more than other causes. I remember hearing that a few months ago there were several drunk vehicle crashes in different parts of the city at night. There are simply no driving and texting accidents reported to the Arizona Department of Transportation, it is simply drunk driving. On its face, a ban on texting while driving may be effective since it is a law and lawmakers expect citizens to follow it to discourage it. this practice. As we delve deeper into the situation, there will be ways that this enforcement of the law becomes difficult. Law enforcement admits it can be difficult to spot a driver texting while driving because the driver's phone is hidden from view of law enforcement. Some observations may prove this, as some San Luis drivers who were texting while driving did not get arrested. Another problem that can arise when enforcing this law is that a percentage of teenagers and millennials will not comply with it. For example, Karen Cordova, a teenager from Arizona, admits that she sometimes texts her friends while driving. The reason is that she texts to cure her boredom and loneliness when she returns home from her part-time job at a supermarket. She's already been in an accident with oncoming traffic and she's aware that texting and driving is illegal in Phoenix, a city where texting and driving was already banned before the bill passed. . Karen says no one will listen to a ban on texting and driving because it won't stop people from doing it, not even her and her friends. Even former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer supports this argument because she claims that sometimes legislating doesn't make much difference and people won't follow them. What we can conclude from this is that a part of the citizens of San Luis will not also respect this ban, which will cause it to lose its effectiveness. Although the survey indicates otherwise, 16 people believe banning texting and driving will be effective in endingtexting while driving because it's a law and people are afraid if it's broken. Having this fear is understandable, but perhaps they haven't looked at the situation deeply enough. This is a behavior that teenagers and millennials like to engage in at times, so they would ignore this ban. It seems that they are not encouraged to ignore their smartphone use while driving. People have seen this message against texting and driving in the news, social media, and advertisements for some time. For example, billboards that distract drivers' attention to send a message about a method of distracted driving or public service announcements that can be effective with their message. The citizens of San Luis are aware of these messages as they are relayed to children and their parents so that the community is safe. Given the very low number of accidents in San Luis, it can be assumed that citizens may be aware of the dangers of texting and driving and the positive consequences that can arise from them. According to the survey, 5 people disagree that the Citizens of San Luis are not aware of the dangers of texting while driving. These 5 people are overshadowed by those who agree and somewhat resent the situation. This isn't really a surprise since driving is safe because the dangers are in their minds. I experienced my first texting and driving situation a few years ago and the experience was quite interesting. My older brother and I were going to do some shopping in our hometown. During our trip, my older brother took out his cell phone and started texting. I'm nervous because he doesn't keep his eyes on the road and becomes a danger to other drivers. However, he seemed confident in his ability to drive, so he continued. I noticed he had quick reactions while driving to maintain control of the vehicle. I didn't know if I should tell him whether or not something was going to happen because of this. For some reason I gave him the option to text and drive unless something important happened. Along the way, there was a delayed reaction to right his vehicle, but it was not serious. After the trip the same thing would happen in our future races in San Luis and Yuma and there were no accidents. What I observed from him were his quick reactions and accountability about whether it was appropriate to text and drive at certain times. I can say the same thing when my brother searches for a phone number and a song to listen to. That said, I trust him to text and drive. Sometimes I had to write and send messages or emails because they are long. He takes responsibility when he is on the road, even with my niece and/or nephew in his vehicle. I also want to mention that he doesn't use his phone much while driving. Using children and adolescents can be an effective way to bring about change if the evidence supports it. By texting and driving, concerned parents using their child's death or tragic accident can convince lawmakers to take action on this situation to bring about change. Parents would worry if their children were victims of texting and driving. This is completely understandable, because children are supposed to be protected from danger. The survey shows that teens and millennials would be concerned if children were in a vehicle when the driver was texting. The same can be said if the adolescent or.