-
Essay / Analysis of Prostitution in Terms of Philosophy by Lars Ericsson
In terms of philosophy, prostitution is defined as a means for a person to amplify their financial consumption or, in other terminologies, "benefits" in exchanging something that she has easily, in this case, their bodies. It is often assumed that prostitution is immoral, but this topic is one of the least debated among most moral situations. Limited fundamental philosophical approaches to the issue have been mentioned. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Among these, in particular, Lars Ericsson's "Defense of Prostitution" reinforces the substantive principles of individuality, equality of opportunity and the unrestricted market of the sexual market. life. The real dilemma of prostitution, says Ericsson, lies in the insincerity, prejudice and disciplinary perspectives that surround it. Ericsson justifies that if we remove these relationships from prostitution, with some modifications, ethically appropriate, or “healthy,” prostitution can possibly exist. On the other hand, according to British philosopher Carole Pateman, the main feminist debate states that prostitution continues to exist. be ethically unfavorable regardless of the modifications made, because it is one of the most explicit cases of male domination over women. In this case, prostitution constitutes a particularly appalling example of patriarchy. Since patriarchy is cruel, prostitution is just as cruel. One may well agree with Pateman's statement and it is in fact such a position that will be discussed in this article. Lars Ericsson argues that if we embrace the principles of individuality, equal opportunity and an unrestricted market, then prostitution should be treated like any other trade in goods or services in an open society. Overcoming these preconceptions would allow morally proper or “healthy” prostitution to come into being. This is incorrect because Lars is far from having imagined a "morally healthy prostitution", and his attempt demonstrates ignorance or stubborn disregard for the patriarchal aspect of our humanity. Erricson also states that prostitutes don't sell themselves, they sell their sexual services. . He defends this by asserting that anyone whose job it is to sell a particular service is not condensed to a commodity, and therefore prostitutes are not condensed to a commodity. Pateman does not view prostitution as simply selling sexual services, as Ericsson claims. “Services and labor power are inseparable from the body and the body is, in turn, inseparably linked to the sense of self. Neither the labor force nor the services can actually be separated from the person who offers them for sale. "Ericsson, accusations against prostitution". Ericsson refutes the feminist accusation of prostitution, which focuses solely on the objectification of women and the domination of men over women in the industry. Furthermore, there are very few male prostitutes in the industry, as ninety-nine percent of all prostitutes are women, and furthermore the number of female clients is almost insignificant. Therefore, the feminist charge also focuses on the fact that prostitutes promote gender discrimination, because they allow women to be bought by anyone who can afford it. Ericsson tests this theory by linking the sale of sexual services to the sale of other services. For example, we do not symbolize a masseuse who offers us a massage service,.