Planning theory, although its emergence is rather recent, has not had a clear definition of what it actually defends nor what it 'it encompasses within its limits. Planning, as a profession, suffered a similar fate; the meaning of each practitioner's role is often lost in translation due to the disparity in approaches to decision-making around spatial development and creating space for people. As such, Fainstein and DeFilippis's readings on planning theory (Structure and Debates in Planning Theory) as well as Marcuse's three historical streams of urban planning would be used to analyze whether planning theory is useful in planning practice. plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned"? Get an original essay In this week's first reading, Fainstein and DeFilippis tackled one of the biggest questions facing planning practitioners today today because of the gap that appears to exist between planning practice and theory. Unlike other professions (e.g. political scientist, economist, or geographer) who have their own default justification or interpretation on matters within their purview, planning theory does not have this cookie-cutter mold. This is mainly because planning is not only carried out by planning practitioners alone, but practitioners face the challenge of balancing the demands of public and private stakeholders, working with unpredictable circumstances of the future and recognizing the inevitable scrutiny that comes with being. in the profession. In addition to all this, it is extremely essential that planners can implement effective and adequate changes in the public interest without ignoring what has not been heard. But all this cannot be achieved without a specific conception of the role that urban planners play in the development of a good city. What is clear is that planning theory evolves over time and it is even possible that multiple conflicting visions of what planning should do can arise over the same period. This is where theorists can help practicing planners achieve results and become advocates for the idea that planning can be used to create an efficient, adequate and accessible city/region for all, whether acts of a politician, citizen or business owner. Drawing on both From the readings and through many stories, it can be concluded that planning theory is important in the field of planning. Although planning theory is a difficult subject to define due to the complexity of its scope, establishing the theory as distantly related to planning practice creates unnecessary barriers and obstacles. Realizing that planning involves not just a singular definitive system of explanation but a mixture of heterogeneous processes could enable planners to make greater use of theories in practice. It is also important to understand theories that address various aspects of planning that exist simultaneously, even though they may be contradictory in nature. Bridging the gap would establish a broader path and guidance to direct planning where planning should go and not just intuition or instinct. Adhering to a theory and using it as a definitive map can take us away from our goal.