In the book Freakonomics, composed by financial expert Steven D. Levitt and journalist Stephen J. Dubner, the authors experimented with various elements of life today to demonstrate how economics clarifies why people act in certain ways, as well as how explicit outcomes occur. They look at different elements of society and view them with exchange perspectives. Through the use of unambiguous data and essential principles of economics, the dark examinations and individual sections of the book show the relationship between human instinct and economics. The authors' views on economics, educational framework, and human instinct truly caught my attention and broadened my vision. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Levitt describes the book as an incentive to peel away the outer layer of current life and see what's happening underneath. He achieved this by taking double chances that are unrelated and combining them. Whether it's a look at sumo instructors and wrestlers, or curiosity about why crack dealers still live with their mothers. Levitt and Dubner revolutionized the standard perspective by studying it through globally diverse perspectives. From the beginning of the book, the writers had the opportunity to grab my attention and arouse my enthusiasm for the assurances they had endeavored to reveal. The way the authors dissected the crimes and the association between authorized fetal removal and its impact on crime rates had a positive impact on me. Unlike most books, this book has no central idea; in fact, during the opening segment, Levitt clarified this as a design. The main concern was to make people question ideas and thoughts that are normally considered valid. One of the essential elements of this book is that the powers of persuasion are the establishment of life today and that the examination of economics is the examination of incentives: how people get what they want or what they need, especially when different people need or want something. basically the same. Freakonomics opened my eyes to how motivating forces, incentives, and risks play remarkable roles in ordinary events in our society today. Overall, reviews of freakonomics, perhaps like no other quantitatively organized book, have succeeded in differentiating the view of the world from the point of view of a moralist and the view of the world of an analyst. Regardless, while morality is concerned with how an individual may need the world to function, economics is interested in how it actually functions. References Levitt, SD and Dubner, SJ (2009) Freakonomics. New York: Harper Collins