The newspaper article written by Ernst Troeltsch expressing support for the new Weimar Republic has value because it was written by a liberal , which means that it is based on someone's opinion. who campaigns for democracy and is a supporter of the Republic. This means that it is the point of view of someone who theoretically represents the center of German politics that is valuable to a historian, because it means that the author would not advocate an extreme political point of view, but rather give a comprehensive political perspective that eliminates the possibility of a sense of bias. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Troeltsch would be considered a member of the "educated elite", which is valuable to a historian since his position as a historian and theorist gives the source credibility as he would have no underlying sentiment of bias. We can also see that Troeltsch is very passionate about this topic as he uses emotional and dramatic expressions such as "volcano of misery", however, this may limit the value of the source because given that he is a strong believer in Weimar Republic, this may have been seen as trying to persuade people to support the new republic, inevitably making this newspaper article a form of propaganda. The publication date of the article (1918) also supports my previous point since Troeltsch was writing at a time of extreme political tension with the shock defeat of the war and growing extremist resentment (the Spartacist uprising occurred just days after publication of this article). ). This is valuable for a historian studying the collapse of Weimar democracy, as it can be seen that the new Republic was flawed and hated from the start, and would therefore be unable to prosper in the years to come, inevitably preventing its collapse. The content of this source is valuable to a historian because it provides an accurate prediction of what might happen if Germany failed to establish a "conservative democracy", while also highlighting the political threats the new republic could face. potentially be confronted: the “terrorist minority on the continent”. left” and “right-wing demagogues”. Indeed, the Weimar Republic was created at a time of chaos and confusion after Germany's loss in World War I and many people were unhappy with the government which had signed the Treaty of Versailles in 1919. The defeat of the war came as a huge surprise to the German people. which gave rise to a theory that they were “stabbed in the back” by politicians. This therefore gave rise to various uprisings that Troeltsch had correctly predicted: the threat to the left expressed in the form of the Spartacist uprising of January 1919, and the resentment against the "right-wing demagogues" (in reference to the Nazi party) taking the form of the Kapp (1920) and Munich (1923) putsches. This is valuable for a historian studying the collapse of Weimar democracy, because it can be seen that democracy "digged its own grave" when it agreed to sign the Treaty of Versailles, which inevitably sparked resentment extremist which led to its collapse. : This is just a sample.Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a custom essayOverall, this paper is valuable for a historian because he can see that the Weimar Republic was flawed from the very beginning beginning when it signed the Treaty of..