Table of ContentsCharismatic LeadershipTransformational LeadershipMain SimilaritiesOriginsFocus:Benefit Sharing:Succession:CriticismsThere is no single definition of leadership. Many people have different definitions and concepts of leadership that can be applied to different situations. Leadership involves a leader building a relationship with his followers and inspiring them to implement the vision outlined. Albert Murphy (1941) believed that leadership is a sociological rather than a psychological phenomenon. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay. Two leadership styles that this article seeks to examine are transformational and charismatic leadership. Transformational leadership and charismatic leadership styles may be similar, but they have fundamental differences. The charismatic leader uses charm and attraction to create inspiration and loyalty in his followers. Some charismatic leaders are Malcolm X, John F Kennedy and Donald Trump. The transformational leader aims for changes in individuals and social systems through a unified vision. The transformational leader is able to excite, arouse and encourage his followers to put in extra effort to achieve the group's goals. They encourage their followers to be more innovative and creative. Abraham Lincoln was a transformational leaderCharismatic leadershipSociologist Max Weber (1947) used the term to describe a form of influence based not on tradition or formal authority, but rather on followers' perceptions that a leader is endowed with exceptional qualities. According to Robert House (1976), in Charismatic Leadership Theory, followers attribute heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors. The general characteristics of charismatic leaders are: they have a vision, they are willing to take personal risks, they are sensitive to the needs of their followers, they demonstrate extraordinary behaviors. These descriptions imply that charismatic leadership is based on a person's behavior, when observed by others. , is defined as charismatic leadership. Transformational leadership, on the other hand, is a concept that can be taught to people to make them more effective leaders by using concepts that contribute to leadership relationships. Transformational LeadershipTransformational leadership is defined as a leadership approach that brings about change in individuals. and social systems. In its purest form, it creates valuable and positive changes among followers with the vision of transforming followers into leaders. The transformational leader believes his followers succeed. They are able to excite, arouse and inspire followers to put in extra effort to achieve the group's goals. Transformational leadership builds on transactional leadership: it produces levels of follower effort and performance that go beyond what would occur with a single transactional approach. Transformational leaders connect their followers' future aspirations to the organizational vision and persuade them to achieve the organization's goals for self-satisfaction. Transformational leaders attempt to build rapport by giving personal attention to their employees and showing that they care about themselves and thus improve social well-being. be employees. The goal of transformational leadership isto give followers the opportunity to share their views and opinions on matters concerning the organization or on personal matters. This helps develop trust among followers and creates an environment where people can trust and respect their leaders. Such an environment also gives people the opportunity to explore different ways of doing things and promote creativity and innovation. Transformational leadership theories believe that people are motivated by the task that needs to be accomplished. The bigger the organization, the greater the success. People are therefore motivated to maximize their potential within the organization, which may be their first need, and they will place their individual interests second. Here, the emphasis is on teamwork and collective action. Individuals exist in the context of community, rather than competing within an individualistic framework. Key Similarities Transformational leaders, like similarly charismatic leaders, inspire followers to transcend their own interests for the good of the organization, although researchers believe that transformational leadership is broader than charismatic leadership. They serve as role models and inspire followers. They challenge their followers to take more ownership of their work. These leaders understand the strengths and weaknesses of their followers, so they can align them with tasks that will harness their peak performance. Specifically, transformational leaders pay attention to the well-being of their individual followers. They engage with them and communicate with them on personal issues that persuade followers to feel positive and participate in the success of the organization. It is possible for personality sects to emerge from an organization in which there is cooperation and the leader is admired. There are many examples, from Fidel Castro to Ronald Reagan, where excessive dedication to one person compromised critical conclusions about the quality of leadership. Unfortunately, in achieving consensus, mediocrity can result. The same is true for charismatics, with Robert House (1977) characterizing charismatic leaders as those who have charismatic effects on their followers to an unusually high degree. These followers perceive the leader's beliefs as correct. and accept it without question. They are affectionate towards. the leader and are emotionally involved in the mission of the group or organization. Along the same lines, a transformational approach may not be as effective as a more centralized and directive form of leadership. An extreme case of transformational leadership would be anarchy and if the members of an organization have assertive personality and intelligence, it can take a considerable amount of time to make decisions and complete required tasks. In extreme cases, indecision can lead to organizational ruin, especially if many individuals are more predisposed to being followers rather than decision makers. Origins Charismatic Leadership: People believe that charismatic leaders are born and not made. Charismatic leadership theory believes that leaders are born, they cannot be made, that the leader has all the necessary qualities that make him a perfect leader, it further believes that charismatic leaders are the most successful and that these leaders have more followers than any other leader who adopts a different leadership style. Charismatic leaders have a phenomenal, natural charm that can attract people; Additionally, this leadership style cares about people and their needs. The managementcharismatic creates a positive and democratic work culture where each follower can raise their voice to address their grievances. The central idea of ​​charismatic theory is that it puts the people first; therefore, the charismatic leader has more followers than any other leader. A charismatic leader motivates his followers who must make them feel the important aspect of the nation (Parolini, 2012). Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders are adaptive leaders and most are trained to be leaders. A transformational leader is one who always shows people his or her particular vision and mission and motivates them on their path and mission. These leaders are eloquent and passionate speakers who motivate people by showing them their mission. People follow these leaders because they have an indomitable, authentic, intrinsic passion and spirit. Transformational leaders do not ask people to follow them, but the intensity of positive passion and honesty of these leaders motivates them. people to join transformational leaders. Subsequently, the message of these leaders has a lasting impact on listeners. The transformation leader believes in empowering people. Therefore, empowerment is the key to success (Parolini, 2012). Focus: Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders may not want to change anything in the organization, whether for better or worse. Charismatic leaders have their own personal vision and mandate, where everyone is expected to follow suit while being sensitive to the needs of followers. Transformational leadership: Transformational leaders primarily focus on transforming the organization and their followers. Transformational leadership is a relationship of mutual duplication and advancement that converts followers into leaders and can convert leaders into moral agents (Burns, 1978); the leader's influence process allows followers the space to have the impact of the vision. The leader provides a learning environment and role models as a learnerSharing Benefits: Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders tend to work more for personal benefit and image building. Transformational leadership: Transformational leaders tend to work more for the betterment of the organization and their followers. The charismatic leader is responsible for articulating the vision and gaining agreement and commitment to it. On the other hand. the transformational leader is open to the contribution and impact of U1e followers on the vision, which promotes power sharing. Succession: Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders are difficult to replace. Charismatic leadership theory is a style of leadership in which followers attribute heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities when they observe certain behaviors. Transformational Leadership: Transformational leaders will be succeeded by the next commanding officer of the organization if they are well trained. Transformational leaders inspire their followers to transcend their own interests for the good of the organization and are able to have a profound and extraordinary effect on their followers. They pay attention to each follower's concerns and needs, promote intelligence, provide vision and a sense of mission, communicate high expectations, and can change followers' awareness of issues by helping them examine older problems in the future. 'a new way. CriticismsBoth leadership styles have been criticized on the basis of their negative effects. The downside of leadership.