A person campaigning for a public interest campaign must always keep national security and national interest in mind, as they are above the right to information of citizens. Freedom of the press is part of freedom of expression and as such a fundamental right and is considered “the concern of all other freedoms in a democratic society”. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay However, there are exceptions called privileges. The most famous is the attorney-client privilege, which exempts a lawyer from testifying against a client regarding confidential communications. Many states recognize similar privileges for doctors, therapists, religious counselors, and spouses. They all arise from the belief that there is a public interest which justifies the exclusion of the testimony of some people against others. Journalists argued that they should be given privilege for broadly similar reasons. They rely on sources to provide the information they publish, and these sources may not share sensitive or critical information in the absence of anonymity for fear of being punished for sharing it. Thus, privileges have been developed to protect journalists because it is in the public interest to encourage the disclosure of newsworthy information. When a law restricting freedom of speech and expression does not directly undermine or overthrow the security of the State, the law cannot fall within the scope of a reservation under article 19, paragraph 2, even though the restrictions it seeks to impose may have been intended generally in the interests of public order. It follows that Article 9 (1-A), which authorizes the imposition of restrictions with the broader aim of ensuring public safety or the maintenance of public order, does not fall within the scope of application of the restrictions permitted under clause (2) and is therefore void and unconstitutional. [3] It is clear that speeches or expressions on the part of an individual which incite or encourage the commission of violent crimes, such as murder, can only constitute elements likely to undermine the security of the 'State. State means "the absence of serious and aggravated forms of public disorder", as opposed to ordinary violations of "public security" or "public order" which cannot involve any danger to the State itself . Thus, the security of the state is endangered by. crimes of violence aimed at overthrowing the government, outbreak of war and rebellion against the government, external aggression or war, but not by minor violations of public order or tranquility such as unlawful assembly, riot, affray, reckless driving, promoting enmity of the upper classes and etc. In the case of a provision capable of receiving two interpretations, one of which makes it constitutional and the other unconstitutional, it is appropriate to prefer the interpretation which makes it constitutional. The force of the law is bound to diminish if the very objective of that law is not fully achieved by its provisions per se. In other words, the right to freedom of speech and expression is guaranteed without adequate legal protection to journalists in our country. Abundant information in the public interest which needs to be disclosed would remain within the ambit of confidentiality if no protection is given to the rights of the journalist. The relationship between a journalist and his source of information which is anonymous to others must be the same as a lawyer-client relationship or.