In a divided class experiment, Jane Elliott chose to show her class a thought-provoking exercise on the importance of segregation. She wanted to show her students what segregation looks like and what it can do to individuals. Additionally, showing young people how cultural mindsets and abuse can influence one's presentation. Elliott has isolated his class, as indicated by eye protection. Students with dark eyes were considered better than those with blue eyes. They benefited from more time at break, a second for lunch, and a sense of self-worth that comes with feeling above every other person. Blue-eyed students wore collars so that their eye protection could be recognized from afar. The next day, Elliott reversed the situation by giving benefits to blue-eyed students and forcing dark-colored people to look at the students' peasants. Elliott watched with interest as his study hall transformed into a microcosm of society. The peerless group immediately seized on the top status of their councils and turned against the mediocre group. Elliot performed this activity in his study hall to address racial separation and to endorse the effectiveness with which individuals get along in abusive circumstances. Elliot felt that conveying the idea to students that dark-colored students were better, smarter, and that many of those who looked at blue-colored students were dirty, stupid, and mediocre. Elliot ventured into allowing dark colored students to not connect with blue colored students, which in my opinion was Elliot taking the activity too far. I can understand why she was leading her exam while informing the students that they are better than another group and that they should not connect with each other. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay. These activities will therefore go beyond the study hall where the darker gazes towards the students will feel a sense of control over the blue gaze of the students and can even go further and strive to implement their abilities. This perfidious treatment causes striking behavioral changes in both young people's environments. Happy to be on top, blue looks towards children act dominant and energetic. Dark-colored people who watch the children become disbelieving, discouraged and finally need revenge. Elliott clarifies that she had lied the day before. Blue looks towards young people are generally not widespread; dark-colored children are looked at. Elliott has blue eyes herself and she admitted to lying. The children recognize his flashes and necklaces are placed around the necks of the blue-eyed children. The behavior turns out to be increasingly horrific, inciting ridicule and a fight between a blue-eyed child and a darker-looking child. Towards the negotiation part of the day, Mrs. Elliott admits to the children what she did and why? She notes that the ability to perform in study hall changes depending on whether young people are “dominant” or “poor” that day. Children wearing necklaces take twice as long to go through the phonics material in a pack of cards. Shortly after, they clarified that they “couldn't think” about their homework when they were so discouraged. The purpose of this activity was to give white individuals an idea of ​​what life is like as an option other than,.