The difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is that the Articles of Confederation lasted from 1776 to 1789. They were also replaced by more informed government which gave them the power to govern the federal government. They were heavily in debt because Congress was unable to pay state taxes. Additionally, they had no federal court, no exchange rate, no executive potential, and the states had to provide a military in which congress could not. The reason why in the Articles of Confederation they were poor because the federal government was what you call a week to have strict laws in which they forced Congress to want a revolutionary war so they could pay off their debt that they could it doesn't pay. “As he had no specific power in matters of taxation, all these proposals were rejected.” This also brought to the point why they couldn't pay for everything because the Articles of Confederation provided no federal court and it all depended on the states to be able to do their own part of the work to make the decisions, not us. It was difficult at the time because the rights could not be modified; this made it difficult for the Articles of Confederation to "give the power to tax, and a national government too little tested." So, in summary, they had no power to do anything and the states made their own decisions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay On the other hand, the Constitution had almost all the rights they could get because they were able to do what they wanted and in which entire lives become better for the entire community. They were able to provide a judicial system, had the right to impose taxes, could raise an army, and they only needed fifty percent, one house, and the president's signature votes to pass the laws, then the Articles of Confederation that needed. almost sixty-nine percent of the legislation approves to be able to pass the laws in which it was more difficult. There are three constitutions divided into three branches: the executive, legislative and judicial branches, and "the separation of powers is simply a means of distributing power among the three branches of government." Check and balance is important because it helps businesses grow and ensure that everything runs smoothly from start to finish. The legislative branch and the executive branch allow the legislative branch to transmit laws and to be able to make laws and modify them. On the other hand, the executive can “refuse to confirm candidates or approve treaties; overturn presidents by a two-thirds vote.” It says in the book that the executive has the right to abolish the laws of the United States. This helps the president not do anything wrong, because he can do bad things and that's okay. In the judicial/executive relationship, the head of the judiciary can declare justice in impeachment trials, while the executive can appoint federal judges to forgo impeachment. The executive is the one who stands by his words and says he doesn't want a trial and lets the trial not continue for what happened in his (personal) situation. Additionally, on a legislative level, they can declare war because Article 1 gives Congress the right to declare war only if the United States has a war on its hands. Furthermore, within the.