Table of ContentsEthical TheoriesPart OnePart TwoEthical TheoriesPart One Based on the ethics of rights, every citizen of the American population has the right to be vaccinated against the pandemic . However, the vaccine can only support and cover seventy percent of the population. From an ethical perspective, such a scenario provokes a crisis that must be addressed with the highest priority. Thus, justice theory will be the most appropriate approach to ensure that the most eligible people in the population receive the vaccine. The theory allows individuals to apply “equity” when distributing the vaccine. The “social contract” stipulated by the theory is an ideal approach to ensure that the vaccine is administered to those with the most beneficial qualities to ensure the sustenance of society after the pandemic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essay Deontological ethics will ensure that the priority of the vaccine does not lead to any adverse consequences for the determining organism. A theory whose approach recognizes that the organization responsible for distributing the vaccine has its “duty” to prevent further spread of the pandemic. The organization will also accept that by giving the vaccine to the most viable candidates, it will ultimately have certainty determined by its actions. Thanks to utilitarianism, giving the vaccine to healthy middle-aged people and children will be the best action. The theory holds that administering the vaccine to healthy individuals and middle-aged children will maximize vaccine and population uptake. The action can be justified by the theory of virtual-based ethics, which asserts that the value of the approach lies in the right that the above-mentioned measures will seek. Therefore, administering the vaccine to the most viable individuals in the population is virtuous since the remaining thirty percent would perform the same action if given the opportunity. Part Two The process of selection and administration of the vaccine to the chosen group must comply with the principles of bioethics. Thus, a rigorous selection process will determine which person will receive the vaccine. The selection process will ensure that everyone in the population has the opportunity to decide their fate. This means that all members of the population will be subject to the standard screening test which will first prove whether the individual is infected. After passing the test, it is warranted to proceed with the next screening to determine the health status of the individual. The selection process is essential to ensure that the bioethical justice code allows for a fair decision regarding the vaccine application. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Personalized Essay Additionally, the selection process will seek to adhere to non-maleficence through a selection checklist. If the individual does not meet the required threshold, the determination will be based on whether they will be beneficial in long-term or short-term procedures. Vaccinated people, on the other hand, should have been treated independently. They will have the opportunity to choose the form of vaccine administration that they believe is safest and carries fewer risks. Additionally, individuals who do not meet the vaccine criteria will also be presented with the conditions of the vaccine selection process. Offering the explanations to both groups will ensure that each participant understands that the process is not a personal matter..