WikiLeaks publishes political secrets discovered by whistleblowers around the world in order to educate the public about the truth about what is actually happening in our government. Julian Assange, editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, is wanted by the US government on espionage charges. The United States says Assange leaked classified information to the public that puts the defense at risk. WikiLeaks is responsible for information that influenced Kenya's 2007 elections. Because of this election, a civil war uprising broke out in Tunisia. In addition to election rigging, he leaked the names of the Nazi Party in Britain and revealed secret documents about members of the Church of Scientology. Based on his published documents, Joe Biden, the current vice president, describes him as a “high-tech terrorist.” In order to collect information for publication, whistleblowers upload their stolen documents to an electronic dropbox shared with a server located in different parts of the world. Since the server is not located in the same location, no single organization can claim authority to initiate lawsuits. WikiLeaks takes raw data, makes it available, and allows it to be interpreted by those who read it. Assange says he acts for the good of the people and exercises his freedom of expression. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In this 60 Minutes study, the first ethical question concerns the disclosure of classified information. From the government's perspective, Assange's disclosure of classified information puts the public at risk because he releases documents that often cause an outcry. The Apache video, posted on WikiLeaks by Assange, shows the United States opening fire on residents of Baghdad, where dozens of innocent people were killed. On top of that, 76,000 classified field reports from Afghanistan were exposed, leaving our defense and government vulnerable. However, Assange sees this as an opportunity for voters to make their own decisions about government action. He states: “...we are simply talking about our promise to publish legitimate documents that are supposed to have an impact. » The second ethical issue presented in the 60 Minutes study on WikiLeaks is the system of checks and balances presented by public involvement in the release of these specified documents. Assange uses his own judgment to decide what to publish from sources provided to him by whistleblowers. Government officials and public leaders see this as a threat because it is unclear what is considered appropriate to publish and what is not. Where our government has a system of checks and balances across the judicial, executive and legislative branches, Assange himself decides what to publish..