JSB170 Introduction to Criminology and PolicingAssessment 1 – Research WorksheetHistory of Policing in AustraliaThe Fitzgerald Era (Investigation)Tutor: Jodi DeathTuesday 12pm-1pmZ-207Student: Siobhan Reimer Number: n9146211Declaration of Authorship:By submitting this work, I declare that, unless otherwise noted, this work is entirely my own. I understand that my work may be submitted to SafeAssign and I agree to this taking place. Word Count: PART 1 Research Worksheet Identify four (4) key words/phrases you used to research your article. (1 point)1. The Fitzgerald Era (Investigation)2. History of policing in Australia3. Tony Fitzgerald4. Fitzgerald Queensland SurveyProvide the full reference for your article as if you were citing your chosen article in a reference list (follow the Harvard referencing format found in Citewrite). (1 point) Prasser, Scott; Aroney, Nicolas. 2009 “REAL CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM AFTER FITZGERALD: still waiting for Godot” Griffith Law Review. Vol.18; Number 3; 596-620. Accessed March 28, 2011. doi: 211260348 Identify and summarize, in no more than 50 words each, 3 key points or arguments made by the article you have chosen (3 points) The main argument of this article is that, although it Although there have been many changes to Queensland's public administration, parliamentary procedures and electoral processes, since the Fitzgerald Inquiry, Democratic Governance has improved its investigations into Australian police corruption. This thus leads to the ongoing problems of police corruption in Australia today. Prasser and Aroney (2009) argue that although it was the Fitzgerald Report that opened an investigation into police corruption as a whole, in its 1989 report, Fitzgera...... middle of paper ..... .police. Although this article will be useful for my final report, it will not form the basis of my research; Therefore, further research will need to be conducted.2. A short statement that explains the main objective of the work3. A brief summary of the theory, research findings, or argument (e.g., intended audience, topics covered, main arguments supported, research methods, conclusions drawn, special features)4. Consideration of the usefulness and/or limitations of the text for your research (e.g. reliability of the text, credibility of the author, poor features, omitted content, weaknesses in the argument)5. An evaluative comment on the work that may consider how this work will fit into your research on a topic (e.g. a critical comment, a critical reflection that describes the usefulness or relevance of the information to your task writing).