Many people view the religious knowledge system and ethics as compelling due to the fact that both have established rules and evidence to support what they claim or what they judge to be true. In this word, many people have faith in religion and those who do not follow any religion and who can be considered agnostic (which refers to the existence or non-existence of God is not proven, but that either of these truths is a possibility) will do so. most of the time, they follow what is ethically correct so as not to use consequentialism (which refers to the ethical principle of judging the degree of moral acceptability of an action based on its consequences) as a means to choose what is correct. or not. This essay will focus more on the fact that people can believe something is correct because of their situation or background. From my point of view, you can judge what is correct by looking at whether it is the right thing in your religion or what you find ethical, so these good explanations are not always correct. Because of the above assumption, I will use the religious knowledge system and ethics as a field of knowledge and emotion, faith and reason as a way of knowing and trying to see to what extent good explanations can be true. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The religious knowledge system is reliable for anyone, depending on what faith there is. Many people find it very easy to accept something because their religion tells them it is okay. Believing in something these days is already considered a pact and believers think that if they don't honor the pact they won't get to where they want to be after they die or something bad will happen to them. From the perspective of someone who hasn't really started to believe in anything, the decisions they make or the actions they take will be based on other things whereas when you are a believer, you must accept according to what your religion deems correct. Many people view religion as a form of brainwashing and their assumption may be true. You can observe that someone who believes in something may be against certain aspects of their religion but will still be obliged to believe in it even when making decisions. Believers may be for something but because of religion they start to refuse or be against it. Religion can sometimes have certain limitations but who will you be to change them so most of the time you are forced to follow them. For example, my grandmother's first decision for our religion was Catholic, she dreamed of being Catholic, she wanted to join a Catholic choir but on a certain level, certain practices that Catholics practiced were not really persevering, because it was correct for her, she did not believe in some of their principles and she was forced to change churches now to go to the Pentecostal church, all because she perceived the explanations of some facts as false but were considered correct by the church. So in this case she had her explanations that she considered it good and the church also had her explanations that she considered it good so one of them is wrong but they both have good explanations. Many people cannot understand something even though theywant to understand it. will understand it and should understand it to build their personal knowledge but will not understand it because it has been distorted and leaked by the wrong person. Being ignorant can force you to accept something. An agnosticist who does not believe in the existence and non-existence of God has no side and waits for good explanations to be convinced to choose a role. So at this stage you have no knowledge and you want to gain knowledge but you may be convinced by the wrong person but just because of the good explanation he gives you you start believing that what he said is true . Because you are ignorant and have not acquired any personal knowledge, people can use this fact to give you good explanations to promote their benefits and try to build a strong belief in their principles. For example, my grandmother's sister who never believed in the existence or non-existence of God (agnotist) made a bad choice from her family's perspective. She was turned away by a marabout who told her that she would get whatever she wanted and that she would get in even if she chose to follow him and give him money and at first he explained it in giving evidence so she trusted what he said. but at one point he started asking her for additional things she should do to continue receiving the benefits and when she refuses he told her that she will go to hell because she is following him and chasing her from his century. We therefore see here that the fact that the marabout gave good explanations pushes her to trust him while even he at the end because he was angry admits that what he said was false. It is for this reason that we can say that good explanations are not always true. In this we have rules and things that are already considered ethical and have been proven, so it is already like an automatism and reasonably you will almost be forced by your mind to follow these rules. Most of the time we have people who think that no one is supposed to do something unethical and can be condemned because of it. It is ethically wrong to kill someone, but someone may have good reason to do so, perhaps in self-defense, but ethically it is seen as incorrect. A man should be judged for his act or should judge any action right or wrong by seeing if it is ethical. The fact that it is unethical does not mean it is incorrect, but for someone who believes that anything outside of what is considered ethical is unethical. A friend of my father was tried for the murder of his wife, he accepted the fact that he killed his wife but explained that it was just to defend himself that it was him or her that she was furious and that she took a knife to kill him and she took it back and wanted to stop him but she was moving too fast and randomly he put the knife on his wife. Here in this case the fact that he killed his wife was seen as ethically wrong, but it was simply self defense and he didn't even want to kill her, but ethically it did. was incorrect, so they put him in jail. We can observe that even with a good explanation, this is not always true from someone who believes in laws considered ethical, your action will be judged poorly if it is not considered ethical. However, in this world, there are people who do it. it doesn't matter what has been established, but they just see from their point of view. They choose what is ethically correct based on their emotions, their background, and the consequences it may have. They use.