Or should humans respect and protect each nature? The world was created for both sustenance and pleasure and it must be respected and protected, so that it can continue to provide for humans. If man does not respect or protect nature, it will not reach its full potential to be or become resourceful. In "Thinking Like a Mountain" by Aldo Leopold, when he hunted and killed wolves, it gives the deer an advantage to destroy nature, because wolves usually prey on deer. If deer are given the opportunity to destroy what nature has to offer, it can also eliminate resources for humans. So instead of man indulging in hunting as a source of entertainment, we should protect rather than destroy and let nature follow its life cycle. There are some actions that humans could take part in to protect nature, but there are some things that nature must handle on its own. The world is also there for sustenance and pleasure. When I think of pleasure I think of entertainment as well as the reproduction of life, so without both elements the world would have no purpose and without the world man would not have the ability to create these things and they wouldn't make sense either. source of livelihood. This means that if man does not make the effort to respect and protect the nature that surrounds him, then he will not be able to make the world a resource for his subsistence and