Imagine that you are walking to a park alone, but the park seems run down and dirty. You can't tell when someone last cleaned. If you had trash to dispose of, you wouldn't hesitate to add some more, because you would feel less guilty because it was already unclean. This is the basic concept of the broken windows theory. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay Broken windows theory is a theory of criminal justice that attempts to combat petty crime by stopping deviant behavior such as begging and graffiti. In theory, when carried out successfully, it stops minor crimes while deterring people from committing crimes considered more serious. Indeed, from an outside perspective, it would appear that people care about this particular area, which means the city cares, which in turn means the police care. As adoption continues, people realize that the area is thriving and take pride in its cleanliness, so maintenance continues. The broken windows theory is not only intended to deter the perpetrator, but also for the benefit of the law. submitting citizen. In a study by the Police Foundation of Washington, D.C., it was noted that "residents in neighborhoods with police on foot appeared to feel safer than residents of other neighborhoods, tended to believe that crime had decreased, and seemed to take less measures to protect themselves. crime (staying at home with the doors locked, for example). Additionally, citizens in foot patrol areas had more favorable views of the police than those living elsewhere. And officers who walked had higher morale, greater job satisfaction, and more favorable attitudes toward the citizens of their neighborhood than officers assigned to patrol cars.” People tend to feel safe when they have peace of mind. This surprised the researchers because they found that there was no visible decrease in crime in the neighborhood. The criminal justice world is still divided on whether the theory can work in real life, anywhere. There have been cases where the theory has been put into practice, such as in 1993 in New York. A newly elected mayor named Rudy Giuliani wanted to see changes in crime areas. Alongside Giuliani was Police Commissioner Howard Safir. Both created two policies that contributed to the theory's success. These two policies were implemented under the names Quality of Life and Zero Tolerance. The police cracked down on minor crimes that undermined the city or gave it a “bad” image. The crimes were not serious and actually did little harm to society. These crimes included public drinkers, subway evaders, public urinals, and even "squeegee men" (people who wiped windshields and demanded payment from stopped cars. Many people disagreed with Giuliani and Safir, but to their dismay they were both insignificant and serious crime rates fell dramatically. One of the biggest oppositions to this theory is the question of how to implement this theory. in real life, this can be done in almost any public space. For example, let's take a public space like a public park. The first step would be to clean up all the trash and graffiti in the area and surroundings. Perhaps install new equipment or/304465/