Conflict theory has been used to provide a wide range of social phenomena, including wars and the forced overthrow of governments, the abundance of money and the state of extreme poverty, discrimination and behavior involving physical force with the intent to injure, damage or kill. He attributes much of the fundamental growth of human society, for example democracy and civil rights, to capitalist efforts to command the masses contrary to the desire of social life. He repeatedly considers in all its aspects the ideas of social inequality in the division of materials and is interested in the serious disagreements that are found between the masses. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an original essayA system of ideas advocated by Karl Max (1818-1883), states that a distinct group of people in a nation are in endless disagreement due to competition for limited resources. According to her, the way individuals or masses interact with each other is maintained by dominance and the ability to do something, as opposed to general agreements and conformity. In proportion to conflict theory, those who possess an abundance of valuable possessions and power attempt to hold on to them by any means possible, primarily by forcibly ending the poor and powerless. The word conflict has many meanings in everyday life. Without detail, it includes a continuous exchange of views on a subject, arguments about the validity of the subject, differences of opinion, and vigorous attempts to prevent someone from acquiring what they desire to obtain. There are many reasons for conflict in our society. Many theorists have expressed their opinions on the origin of the word. At different levels, conflict is seen as a tendency to implement two or more incompatible responses at the same time. The incompatible action can come from individuals, or between two or more individuals, or even from a certain number of people. Roderick (1999) states that incompatibility is a state of active mutual opposition or hostility between two or more parties. Conflict theory in sociology attempts to provide more detail about why people think and act the way they do. It is one of several sociological theories that seek to hypothesize and evaluate conflict, social order, ineffectiveness, and efficiency. It is also a theory of power, the use of power and legitimacy. In many cases, it is helpful to approach conflict by assessing the nature of the issue at hand. The purpose of this assignment is to discuss given theories of the causes of conflict and to give examples for each in the whole world. One theory that examines the roots of conflict is Human Needs Theory (HTN), advanced by Australian professor John Burton (1696-1771) and American psychologist Abraham Maslow (1908-1970). Human needs theory proposes that everyone has specific, but not explicitly stated, basic universal needs, and that when these are not met, conflict is certain to arise. Abraham developed a hierarchy of needs starting with food, water and shelter, followed by the need to be safe and feel secure, then a sense of belonging or love, esteem of self and further personal growth and self-realization. As John Burton and Abraham Maslow stated, basic needs stimulate people's interest in taking action when their needs are not met and, byTherefore, this can be a cause of conflict, as people will use their power to satisfy these needs. The longer the needs remain unsatisfied, the stronger the desire. So the longer a person goes without food, for example, the more hunger and the need to search for food increases. The hypothesis of human needs theory is that the damaging lack of material benefits of human beings and the possibilities of social systems to meet their needs expectations for economic resources, security, being who or what a person is are at the root of all violent conflicts. The notion of fundamental human needs arises from our biological phenomena, mental, physical, social, spiritual and physiological needs without which human existence is impossible. Physiological needs are inevitable to sustain life: oxygen, food and water and are necessary for everyone because they are the main goal of life. When an individual's physiological needs are not met, they typically transform into security needs, which can include health, freedom from war, and financial security. If safety and physiological needs are not met, a person will focus on the need for society and love, satisfied by family, allies, and partners. A human being strives to gain respect and admiration once their needs for love and a sense of belonging are satisfied. Self-confidence and acceptance of others are important elements of this need. Respect and admiration are necessary for self-actualization, which is the ability to reach one's true potential. However, the necessary components differ from person to person. Lack of self-respect and admiration or the inability to realize oneself can also cause serious discouragement and despondency, especially when they last for a long time and cause excessive discomfort. The argument of human needs theory is that the inflexible force of people to meet their unmet needs at the individual, collective and societal level is one of the main causes of longer-than-expected or stubborn conflicts, Huitt (2007) . For example, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has unmet needs for identity and security. Too many Palestinians to count feel that they are denied their hereditary right to identity, both personally and nationally. Israelis, on the other hand, feel that they have no security individually because of suicide bombings and, of course, for this reason their state is not recognized by the majority of that of their neighbors; and culturally because anti-Semitism is growing around the world. The unmet needs of Israel and Palestine directly and profoundly affect all other issues related to the current conflict. Accordingly, if a resolution is to be found, the needs of Palestinian identity and the security of Israelis must be taken into account and met with expectations and needs at all levels. Karl Max (1881-1883) is also considered the father of relational theory. known as social conflict theory, which views social life as a competition in which people compete for materials, influence, and inequality. Relationship conflict theory is a macro-oriented model of sociology that views society as an arena of inequality that causes conflict and social change. Key aspects of this perspective are that society is organized to benefit the few at the expense of the many. Karl Max was convinced that human beings are fundamentallyproductive. To survive, people must produce. Furthermore, he believed that people have two relationships with the means of production: you either own the productive property or you work for whoever owns it. For a theorist of social or relational conflicts, it is above all a question of relations between powerful groups and minority groups, Harambos (1995). The theory holds that individuals and groups (social classes) within society interact on the basis of conflict rather than general agreement, whereby powerful groups usually use their power to continue to have it and exploit the powerless . It recognizes that modern society, the criminal justice system and criminal law, functions as a representative of the rich and a group of people considered superior in society, resulting in policies aimed at controlling the poor, therefore control organized systems. in which the upper class completely retains power and the other classes continue to be economically disadvantaged, disenfranchised, and almost without physical strength. Karl Max predicted such conflicts, saying that "every society is based on the active hostility of oppression and oppression." oppressed classes.” With wealth comes power and those who have a lot of money have the power to benefit their country's existence or get rid of the conflict altogether. Relationship conflict theory can be used for good and for bad. An example would be the government resistance rebellion in Somalia, in which the population fights against the government for equality and fairness. The government, for its part, is fighting against its own people to maintain control of power. Similarly, relational conflict theory focuses on those who are in power and wish to remain in power, and those who are not in power and wish to gain it. Unfortunately, it is innocent bystanders who are injured or killed. This is not limited to Somalia; it's all over the world. Those in power want more power and wealth to control those who are less fortunate. The word politics comes from the Greek word "polis" to refer to "aty-states", considered to be the centers of ideas and social behavior of a particular group of citizens. people and an advanced system of human social development where people interact under a unified government. The ancestry of the word therefore suggests that politics is a word that captures human activities that take place within the state. As applied today, it indicates everything that happens within the state as well as between states. According to Thomas (1988), politics refers to social activity, a science by which people collectively put structure, purpose and purpose into their actions for their lives. It is for this reason that it arises not from the activities of a single person but from those of several. It is about conflict and cooperation brought about by diversity between people who disagree in how they see things and who have different opinions in almost every imaginable aspect of life. On the other hand, cooperation stimulates interest in the common goal of men: achieving a happy life. The process of managing conflict to establish order and then maintaining it is politics. In other words, politics is absolutely conflict resolution, Thomas (1988). Because everyone has diverse interests, politics is prone to conflict and when politicians act in the way they think is best for their country, other people in the country have different views, which leads to conflict. Basically, the conflict is.