What does homosociality mean? To be discussed in reference to 'Jules and Jim'Homo-sociality is the relationship between people of the same sex that is not in a sexual or romantic way. This could be considered friendship, mentoring, or something else. Homosocial relationships do not mean that sexual relations are obligatory. This is just normal human same-sex interaction. The opposite of homosocial is heterosocial, that is, having relationships with the opposite sex in a friendly manner and not in a sexual nature. Homosociality is very common around the world but is more highlighted in countries in which heterosexual friendship is more important, particularly in Middle Eastern countries. People involved in homosociality cannot be directly identified as gay or lesbian by nature. They are heterosexual in their orientation and preferences. Homosociality is also not a manifestation of homosexual behavior, nor is it something that can lead to homosexuality. It is a relationship characterized by strong closeness in which two people of the same sex can kiss and hold hands. Kissing, teasing, and even discussing intimate topics are completely natural for homosocials because of the bonds and friendship they have built together over the years. It can also be used to emphasize the characteristics of solidarity between men. Homosocial relationships include discussion of a variety of topics ranging from personal life to sexuality and family. Homosocials often show love and kindness to their friends, but not for sexual purposes. It is an important tool for people to build friendships, develop self-confidence and interactions with people, as well as interconnection with the people around them. However, in some countries, homosociality can also lead to homosexuality, notably...... middle of paper ......2010)In the final scene where Jules comes to the cemetery for the funeral to make his farewelling his friend Jim and Catherine, he recounted the funeral process where Catherine's coffin was relatively small and Jim's was larger, reflecting his views on both relationships. He values ​​his relationship with Jim more and more intimately and views Catherine as the person who ruined the friendship by becoming an interference and taking Jim away from him. In this film, the classic model of the triangle was evoked but it can be seen as a failure of the homosocial triangle involving a woman and her precise reason. Bibliography: Girard, R. (1991). A theater of envy. Oxford. Hentzi, J. C. (1995). The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism. New York.Lingerie, L. a. (2003). Merl Storr. W. Reeser, T. (2010). Masculinities in theories: an introduction.