James Petersen's book, Why Don't We Listen Better? Communicating and connecting in relationships emphasizes the requirement for continued use of good communication, through a series of actions and steps, through the practice of understanding, dynamic listening and perceiving active. Listening then becomes a creative force which creates a context in which the development of a communicative relationship can promote. The communication process is implemented through a two-way channel, because there is the one who listens (the receiver), the opposite speaks (the sender). The prerequisite for a healthy communication relationship begins with the ability to interact in a supportive, valuing context and within the bounds of impartiality. The book is a therapeutic solution to help foster better relationships; it uses the process of communication as an intervention for the journey of self-discovery. Peterson offers two communication platforms. The first platform is primarily focused on engaging in a dialogue in which parties send and receive information. The second paradigm is an emotional response within the communication dialogue. Both communication platforms promote the depth of an intimate relationship between the parties involved. Therefore, placing trust and shared values ​​in an emotional context within the communication process broadens the information process by making it a straightforward method. The book further examines the communication process by giving basic concepts that prove that emotional attachments hinder the listening phase. This is why Peterson calls this concept the “flat brain theory.” This theory holds that emotional communication is infused as information compacted in a stomach, in the middle of a sheet of paper. a little sarcastic remark. I remember that comments that involve putdowns, criticism, and condescension create problematic and manipulative results. Peterson (200) warns us that there are communicative pitfalls that we need to be aware of. Peterson could have explained in more detail how and what to do when this happens. Although I am aware that the book has led me to be more of a listener, the opposite effect is a loss of speaker status. Peterson argues that healthy filters can be used to create healthy relationships that are empathetic and sympathetic in nature. It seems that Peterson wants to include communication in this universally valid and politically correct phenomenon. However, it seems that if we accept this task, we are going against nature.