Before assessing whether Occupy Wall Street achieved its goals, it is best to first agree on what its goal actually was. The Occupy Wall Street movement is an example of direct action against perceived corruption within financial institutions. People were upset that the politicians they elected weren't effectively attacking corporate interests: in fact, most of them were taking money from the same companies OWS was protesting against. Many came to believe that the electoral system could not change and decided to take matters into their own hands. “The Meaning of Occupy” mentioned specific Occupy groups who aimed to implement more regulations. Others had a more ambitious goal: to “destroy the state” and rid the nation of capitalism entirely. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The Occupy movement faltered for the same reasons many far-left groups are dividing: small ideological disagreements kept them apart people. The occupiers came from many ideologies; Some were social democrats who believed that the existence of capitalism could be maintained as long as regulations were in place, others were socialists who believed in seizing the means of production, still others were anarcho-communists who believed in the total destruction of hierarchy, whether it existed or not. of the State or companies. Within the anarchist camp there were disagreements over how to achieve their goal of a stateless society (individualism, syndicalism, collectivism, etc.). Between anarchists and those who believed change could come from within the state, both groups saw each other as naive and these disagreements divided the movement. However, the occupiers shared a common interest: involving companies through direct action that they believed harmed workers. There is a difference between the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street, although they are often compared. The Tea Party had a vertical leadership structure; clear and defined objectives; massive funding of the organizations that formed the Tea Party; and an interest in electoral politics. Occupy Wall Street had a flat leadership structure (decisions were made by consensus) with only common interest (opposition to financial institutions) rather than common goals. They didn't have massive funding, nor did they necessarily need it, and they weren't interested in electoral politics. The Tea Party was considered a legitimate movement because it was supported by politicians and corporations, while the Occupy Wall Street movement was often considered criminal by the general public. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a Custom EssayDid the Occupy Movement Fail? Yes, they did. Although the Occupy movement provided an opportunity for those who felt disaffected by the political system to engage in direct action, the failure to unite caused many to lose interest in the movement. It is much more difficult to unite far-left ideologies than far-right ones. Right-wing ideologies are usually based on the flag, the Bible and money. Far-left ideologies often reject all three, leaving more room for disagreement. If a movement like Occupy Wall Street is to succeed in the future, it must have a common goal in mind..