Table of contents Effects on current societyA conclusionOn November 22, 1963, a tragedy struck the United States and made headlines around the world . John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States, was assassinated while riding in a motorcade through Dallas, Texas, accompanied by First Lady Jacquelyn Kennedy and Governor John Connally. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay As the motorcade passed the Texas School Book Depository Building, at 12:30 p.m., 3 shots were fired from the sixth floor of the building into the presidents open-top convertible. Two of the bullets hit the president, one in the neck and the other in the head, the last bullet hit the governor in the back. Although the governor survived (with serious injuries), Kennedy was pronounced dead thirty minutes after the shooting in Dallas. Park Hospital. As the nation mourned his loss, Vice President Lyndon Johnson was sworn in as the 36th President of the United States, at 2:39 p.m. that day. By then, a nationwide manhunt had been launched for the killer who caused this tragedy. Two hours after the assassination, an arrest was made. Lee Harvey Oswald, who less than an hour earlier had killed a police officer who was questioning him in the street, had been arrested and was now the main and only suspect in the investigation. The world turned all eyes to Oswald when, on November 23, he was formally indicted for the murders of President Kennedy and Officer JD Tippit. While Oswald was taken to a more secure county jail, Oswald was brought to the basement of Dallas police headquarters on November 23. November 24, where he would be temporarily held until they were ready to move him later that day. Police, press and the public gathered outside the building waiting for him to be taken away for transport to the county jail. Many media outlets broadcast live broadcasts of the event. When Oswald was brought outside, the situation was brought to a head. The climax once again when a man emerged from the crowd and with a single shot, from the .38 revolver he had hidden, mortally wounded Oswald. This man was later arrested and identified as Jack Ruby, who claimed to have killed Oswald out of rage over the president's death. The official 1964 Warren Commission report concluded that neither Oswald nor Ruby were involved in a larger conspiracy, domestic or international, to knock out the president. Propaganda Surrounding the Event There has been and continues to be mass propaganda surrounding the event of President Kennedy's assassination. This propaganda is not only spread in the United States but all over the world. 69% of Americans surveyed said they believed in some sort of conspiracy surrounding the events of JFK's assassination. 26% of these Americans said they believed the Mafia or the federal government was involved, making them the two most popular conspiracies. The CIA and Fidel Castro also came close, with 12% of Americans believing the conspiracies that concern them. Propaganda surrounding federal involvement and cover-up Many different researchers, including Mark Lane, Henry Hurt, Gerald D. McKnight, Anthony Summers and others have found what they call inconsistencies in the history of the Kennedy assassination. Some of these things include oversights, exclusions of evidence, errors, changes to stories, or changes to testimony as part ofthe official Warren Commission investigation. This suggests there may have been a cover-up. It is said that the Warren Commission only received information sent to it by the FBI, and that its goal was simply to endorse the lone shooter theory. This is supported by the fact that they did not investigate other leads in this case. Many professionals and investigators involved in this case have made claims supporting this theory. Richard Schweiker, a U.S. senator and member of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, supported this theory when speaking to author Anthony Summers in 1978: "I believe the Warren Commission was created at the time to giving pabulum to American audiences for years. reasons still unknown, and that one of the greatest cover-ups in the history of our country occurred at that time,” he told her. Anti-communist and anti-Castro extremists within the CIA were said to have plotted Kennedy's assassination. , to deal with current tensions with the Soviet Union and Cuba, and to try to prevent the United States' withdrawal from Vietnam. In James Douglass's book, JFK and the Unspeakable, he writes that "the CIA acts on orders." conspirators with a 'military-industrial complex' had killed Kennedy and, in doing so, made a scapegoat of Lee Harvey Oswald.” Douglass also said that Kennedy was killed because he began to turn away from the Cold War and pursue the path of nuclear disarmament, rapprochement with Fidel Castro, and withdrawal from the Vietnam War. It was also thought that Kennedy might have been killed. in order to keep secret the information he planned to share about extraterrestrial life – he was said to be working with Fidel Castro to have this information released globally, against the wishes of other high-ranking government officials. In 1977, the FBI released 40,000 files regarding the Kennedy assassination, these files included an April 3, 1967 memorandum from Deputy Director Cartha DeLoach to Associate Director Clyde Tolson. It was written less than a month after President Johnson learned from J. Edgar Hoover. on CIA plots to assassinate Fidel Castro According to DeLoach, LBJ aide Marvin Watson "said the president told him, in a moment of confusion, that he was now convinced there was a plot related to the assassination Watson said the president believed the CIA had something to do with this plot" Because of this and much other evidence that has circulated in the media in the form of documentaries. From films, news articles and more, many people believe that the CIA and FBI were involved in or carried out the Kennedy assassination, whether in whole or in part. Propaganda surrounding Oswald and his innocence. /Death There is a surprising amount of propaganda and conspiracies in the media and movies to suggest that Lee Harvey Oswald is innocent because of this. Many people believe that Oswald did not kill President Kennedy but rather did. One of the main pieces of evidence that suggests this is true is Oswald's alibi for the time of the assassination and what is considered photographic evidence of that alibi. Oswald claimed during interrogation that he was "out there with Bill Shelley out front," but interrogator Will Fritz lied to the Warren Commission. He claimed Oswald told him he was "having lunch with other employees" during the assassination. Surprisingly, he did not name these employees, which is surprising because he cited them as Oswald's alibi. It is even more surprising that the Warren Commission's lawyer, Joseph Ball, did not ask him toname them, even though he was a lawyer who knew both the meaning and importance of a defendant's alibi. The next piece of propaganda that has been featured in many online and film documentaries relating to this theory is the "man in the doorway" photo. This is a photo taken the day of the shooting of a door in front of the Texas School Book Depository Building. Although this photo is not of the best quality, it clearly shows a man standing in the doorway with a remarkable and notable resemblance and similarities to Oswald. Modern professionals in the field of facial recognition technology have examined the photo and concluded that it is very likely that the man in the photo is in fact Oswald and that, if that were the case, he could not be the shooter . When this photo surfaced, the government decided to comment on it and claim that the man in the photo was Billy Lovelady. The problem is, if this was really just an ordinary, unimportant guy, why would the government feel obliged to make an official statement about it? – having to take the necessary means to identify this man in order to achieve this. The resemblance between Oswald and "the man in the doorway" is simply too remarkable in the case of Oswald's innocence not to consider it, quite possibly, the most important piece of evidence in this case. . Unfortunately, Lee Harvey Oswald never got the chance to defend himself. himself because he was mortally wounded by a shot fired by Jack Ruby on the afternoon of November 24. Although this could have easily been avoided, as on November 24, Dallas County Police Headquarters was called and informed that someone was going to kill Oswald, but they did nothing to try to prevent this. . It was obviously very clear (in the photo on the right) that everyone in the room expected this, but they needed Oswald dead so that the information he knew wouldn't be leaked. Even though Ruby has the gun only inches from Oswald, none of the officials take a second look or try to stop her, as if that's what they expected. Jack Ruby – His Involvement, Information, and Sudden Death We can assume that anyone with the potential to share information about the true events of the JFK assassination is considered a threat to national security and "eliminated", as the same thing happened to Jack Ruby that people think happened to Oswald – he was killed to hide information from the public. Jack Ruby died in 1967, while awaiting his second appeal trial for the murder of Oswald, allegedly due to a pulmonary embolism caused by lung cancer. Although it was very sudden and no one had heard of his lung cancer in the past, this naturally made him quite surprising and suspicious. What makes it more suspicious is the fact that it was confirmed that Ruby had agreed and planned to meet with a local news station, just a week after her death, as he said he was "willing to tell the real story and information regarding the Kennedy assassination". Due to his sudden death, he was never able to do that and share his story and the information he had with the world. Propaganda and its Effects on Today's Society Propaganda has very large-scale effects on society around the world. Not only does it have significant effects on individuals' interpersonal feelings, but it can also have massive effects on relationships. and current and future connections Indeed, individuals' personal views and opinions dictate..