Intuitively, there is a presumption that we, as members of society and citizens of the world, should make the world a better place. For this reason, it can be concluded that moral constraints must be imposed on consequences. Consequentialism does not examine the effects of action on people and only sees the outcome. Human rights violations in war are the result of the aims of war to achieve peace and improvement. Consequentialism has no moral guidelines, so there is never a limit. It only examines the consequences of actions. Consequentialism is an “all means necessary” ethical mindset that expects better circumstances to result from actions. Consequentialism challenges morality because only consequences justify action. As taken from the "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" website from a page titled "Deontological Ethics", as paraphrased: "Consequences can justify any act, no matter how harmful it may be to some, as long as it is beneficial to others. » (Alexander and