In The Economists article, “America's Poor Who Need Help” talks about poverty in the United States of America, particularly during Barack Obama's time in office. The Economist's take on the global poverty argument, particularly in the United States, draws on a strong argument and extensive research and statistics to show the lifestyle of the 10.5 million of Americans trapped in poverty, while giving several paragraphs of factual, unbiased evidence as to why. for the high percentage of poverty in America, without providing solutions to remedy the situation. With a strong voice and a recognized use of logistics and an appeal to emotion, The Economist writer presents a strong argument that will give the audience a new stance on the topic of poverty in America. "America's Poor Who Need Help" is aimed at a broad audience generally consisting of any normal citizen who is generally interested in politics or everyday economics, which will allow the article to influence many people. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The article begins with strong pathos for several paragraphs that hook the reader by telling the story of a destitute woman who recently lost her home due to a workplace accident that left her unable to carry out his former professional duties. The author of The Economist uses very strong diction that captures the reader's attention and encourages them to continue reading. After starting with two related anecdotes, the article moves towards a more factual and logistical form of writing. Leading with staggering statistics; “About 15% of Americans (about 46.2 million people) live below the poverty line” (5). The Economist immediately shocks the reader by revealing the immediate truth about the large number of people living in poverty in America. The first page of the article, as presented, sets the tone for the rest of the article: a solid balance of heavy pathos, and then a solidification of the argument right after with hard facts. Right after, The Economist explores the political side of the American economy. The government plays an important role in trying to help people living in poverty. American politicians have been shown to strive to help the poor throughout history, until recent years. “Mitt Romney said he wasn't 'concerned about the very poor' because they have a safety net to cover them” (7). Furthermore, it is written that Barack Obama only spoke about the poor once, during his two-four-year term. Perhaps the point of these policy examples is to highlight the harsh reality that helping the poor has become too costly for new presidents to act on. This is then expanded upon and shown to have many possible negative outcomes. The author analyzes the impact of less pro-poor policy action, giving examples such as: "The deterioration of family structure among the poor threatens to trap poor children at the bottom of the ladder income for the rest of their lives” (8). The author goes on in a later paragraph to show other examples of specifically youth poverty and the racial aspect of the poor in order to further break down the argument. The Economist continues with a paragraph that presents the demographic relationship with poverty. We can attempt to take a position here by showing the correlation between race and.