Cloning has been a controversial topic around the world long before the cloning of Dolly the sheep in 1996, and it has recently become a real possibility that seems much more feasible today than it did twenty years ago. (National Human Genome Research Institute, n.d.) The ability to clone a creature prompted researchers to think about a more difficult task, cloning people. To begin with, cloning is a procedure that involves joining together the same cells or living things all from a single individual. It is unclear when or how cloning people will become a possibility. However, it is understood that there are two conceivable ways of cloning people. The first method involves splitting a fetus into a few pieces and creating many new people from that embryo. (Wikipedia, 2018) The second approach to cloning a human involves taking cells from an existing individual and cloning them, thereby creating different people identical to that specific individual. (Wikipedia, 2018) With these two techniques almost available, two crucial questions arise. Can we do this, and would it be a good idea for us too? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The idea of ​​cloning humans is ethically wrong and should not be defended. Some people do not seem to understand the harmful effects that cloning would have on the world. Religious views, population growth and the personality of each human being are just some of the reasons why cloning should not be legalized. Just because there are a few variables that might seem beneficial does not negate the harm it would cause. A proponent of cloning, Simon Smith, says it is useful to create clones for fertility reasons, for example for infertile couples and couples with a hereditary disease. (Smith, 1998) This statement seems reasonable; nevertheless, there are other alternatives such as adoption, artificial insemination and more suitable surgical interventions. It seems controversial whether a man to create clone offspring of himself would be degenerate or selfish to have to do such a thing. Some proponents of cloning, for example Professor Robert Winston, argue that cloning would be a viable alternative available to people who have lost a friend or family member through death. (Wikipedia, 2018) Have we neglected our ideals and the fact that with the introduction of life, one day will come? It's not something most people expect for themselves or someone they care about, but one day it will inevitably happen to all of us. Individual personality is also another factor to take into account when thinking about the results that cloning would bring. The personalities of people and different animals are what inspire you to care for them and bond, not their physical appearance. Having a clone that is only similar in appearance and not in identity or character would not bring back a lost loved one. Instead, it might even make it significantly harder for people to cope and manage the situation. If clones were created, we would lose this uniqueness. Having human clones present would be an insult to the humanity and uniqueness of each person. It would change the human being. The clones could probably become another minority fighting for equal rights. Would you be able to imagine what it would feel like to realize.