In today's society, many people believe that student-athletes have it easier than the average student. They have these ideals about student-athletes because they believe that every athlete has a scholarship and their education is paid for as well as their room and board. However, many college athletes struggle to get a hot meal in their stomach, have clean clothes, and have the daily necessities to live on because their scholarship only pays for certain things. In this case, college athletes should be paid, as many go through difficult times and trials in their student-athlete lives while in college. Simply put, college athletes should be paid because of what they bring to their schools and what these people put on the line when they play sports while trying to be model students. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay When the word student-athlete comes to mind, what comes to mind? Many people think about what sports they enjoy watching or might be less likely to watch and how these athletes have scholarships to play those sports. The organization that most of these student-athletes play for is called the National Collegiate Athletic Association or more commonly known as the NCAA. The NCAA is “a member-driven organization dedicated to the well-being and lifelong success of college athletes.” (NCAA) The NCAA is one of the largest college organizations for every sport with major programs in football, basketball, baseball and etc. What many people don't know is that the NCAA is an organization that makes billions of dollars off of these student-athletes who play these sports and never make a dime. Overall, because the NCAA makes a lot of money from these students, the argument that student-athletes are paid has been made. Many people don't believe that student-athletes should be paid to play a sport because they are already "paid" to go to school. To explain why people believe that a scholarship is enough for athletes to live on while they are in school, and not receive any type of check to entertain thousands or even millions of people every week. According to the source, In Matter of Fact states: "Maybe 40 or 50 years ago it was good, but now it's a whole new generation where a lot of broadcast networks have a bunch of TV deals and sponsorship agreements. Not giving these student-athletes any type of salary or payment on these sponsorship deals that the NCAA makes for them to play this sport is flat out wrong. Therefore, when these people and organizations get support and TV deals, why not pay the student-athletes when the NCAA makes millions of dollars off the names and performances of these students? Although some believe student-athletes should be paid, others disagree and believe they should not receive any compensation. One of the many things people argue is that schools shouldn't be able to pay student-athletes at all, but that sponsorships acquired by schools should be able to provide a salary for athletes. As explained in the article Student Athletes Should Not Be Paid While Some Students Still Have Loans to Pay for School, written by Nicole Smith, she states, "With the debate overpaying college athletes, I find the answer simple: let the school do it.” their share in paying for a full trip worth up to $176,000.” The author is trying to demonstrate here that athletes do not deserve to receive extra money outside of the scholarships given to them by the school, when they are normal people who have to struggle alone to pay for their studies. . The author then raises the reason why sponsorships should compensate student-athletes. Smith then states "allowing companies like Nike and Adidas to pay individual athletes whatever they want to have an athlete wear their branded shoes during a game." As far as I'm concerned, this is an equally important business deal that any college athlete should receive at this point in their career. This statement says that since big companies get promotions from these players wearing their gear, then the players should be paid in return. Overall, like many, Smith believes these athletes should be paid, but not by the schools, but by the companies that make money off their name and image. There are many reasons why student-athletes should be paid and there are a vast majority of ways that colleges or companies should pay them. One of the most important reasons why a student-athlete should be paid is because the sport they play is like a full-time job because it requires a lot of time and commitment if you want to be successful. In the source titled Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate, written by Madisen Martinez, states: “Being a college student-athlete is a full-time job, bouncing between the weight room, the field, classes, and film sessions. College athletics is an extracurricular activity, but National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) tournament schedules require an extended period of time during which student-athletes must miss school. This quote refers to the fact that athletes have a much greater load than the average student, as they have to juggle the busy schedule of being a football player and a full-time student. Later in the article, the article returns to the amount of money the NCAA makes from athletes: “Not only are they missing classes, but they are also missing the nationally televised games that bring in a lot of money. money and attract millions of viewers. ". When the NCAA makes so much money from athletes, why can't it give them a single cent? After all, student-athletes essentially work full-time while also being full-time students. Another reason student-athletes should not be paid is because they are not playing the sport at its highest level. The main goal of getting a scholarship is to be able to get an education that some people might not otherwise be able to afford by not paying to play a sport that they don't play professionally. In the source titled Should College Student-Athletes Be Paid? Both Sides of the Debate, written by Madisen Martinez, she states in the article: “Even though these college student-athletes are playing at an advanced level, they are still not playing professionally,” Anderson notes. It’s not their job to play sports; it is an extracurricular activity that is practiced while pursuing higher education. Student-athletes go to school to learn, and many are fortunate to do so inexpensively, often thanks to athletic scholarships.generous. If these athletes were paid, their motivations as students would change. They are still in college – which is a privilege in itself – while still pursuing their dream of playing a sport.” To explain the quote itself, it's one of those things where the ability to be able to attend school should be enough, but that doesn't take into account the athlete's personal life and the difficulties that can come with it. Overall, Martinez gives some good perspectives on why the student-athlete should not be paid, but from my perspective, the reason most athletes attend college is to continue to play the sport they love and not go to school for free, that happens to be a bonus. . The NCAA should at least start paying athletes from big or well-known programs in sports like football and basketball, because they bring in the most money. An example of this would be the case of Ohio State's Chase Young and the potential No. 1 overall draft pick in this upcoming NFL Draft. He is currently one of the biggest names in college football and Nike and the NCAA have made a lot of money selling his jersey and using his image. In fact, Young was suspended for violating NCAA rules by borrowing money from a family friend so he could fly his family to one of the most important games of his career. He actually paid that money back in full, but the NCAA didn't see it that way and decided he receives an unfair advantage because of who he is, but they don't see a problem with using it to win money. money. Well, this is due to the many things these programs have done to generate a huge amount of cash flow for the coaches and programs. In source Pay to Play: Should College Athletes Get Paid? written by Krikor Meshefejian, he argues that these university programs do many things. One of the few things he states is: "The reality is that college sports programs, namely 'big name' programs such as football and basketball programs at big name schools, are businesses that could make a lot of money for their respective schools. (Meshefejian 5). In other words, the author is trying to say that if these programs can make these kids so much money, why can't they give them the money they make every week? Like Young's example, these student-athletes don't see any of the money they make, but the NCAA doesn't understand that some of these kids don't have it that way. Last year, California decided to introduce a new bill that would allow college athletes to earn money off their image and name by being able to sign endorsement deals and even hire a agent. They are fighting the NCAA's philosophy that athletes should get a diploma, not a test. More states are slowing down to follow in California's footsteps and it's long overdue since the NCAA generated a whopping $14 billion in revenue this year alone. This has caused major concerns within the NCAA, as it fears college sports are becoming more of a business than students trying to earn a degree. They also tried to apply a measure against this bill by saying that they would consider the schools ineligible because they fear it would become unfair because more athletes would go to these schools in California for the opportunity to earn money. money that could really help them. THE ?.