blog




  • Essay / The pros and cons of traditional students

    The reason is simple, things are not cheap. Jonathan Orszag of Upromise found that "working students can be classified into two groups: those who identify primarily as students but work to pay the bills, and those who are primarily workers who also take college courses » (Orszag). ). Martin Kramer says: “The costs of college, especially tuition, have risen much faster than real wages in the types of jobs students are likely to get, so more hours of work are needed. work to cover even a constant percentage of costs (Kramer). Jonathan Orszag agrees: “Evidence shows that, in response to the financial burden of tuition, students work more while they study” (Orszag). In College Costs: FAQ it states that "two-year public college for in-district students costs $3,347, four-year public college for in-state students is $9,139, four-year public university for out-of-state students is $22. , 958, and a private four-year college costs $31,231. Kramer states that "aid offices often have fewer grants to give relative to rising costs, so aid offices expect students to cover a greater percentage of their budget through the income and loan bias to meet “self-help” expectations. . . . Students face the self-help dilemma of working more because they want to borrow less” (Kramer). “A job. . . can often afford a student access to a standard of living far beyond the costs that the student aid office recognizes as essential” (Kramer). “In 2000, nearly 830,000 full-time students worked full-time” (Orszag). There are many scenarios in which students work and why they must work despite the difficulty. Washington Post reporter Jenna Johnson documents Tiffany Wilt's story: "She is 19, a high school graduate and a sophomore in her university's honors program..