In this situation also, the offended party (the school power) will first have to demonstrate that Cisco was guilty of the offense on the basis that it involves three elements of negligence. • A quid pro quo obligation: Cisco (respondent) owes a quid pro quo obligation to the school organization not to bring medications or other related things into the school premises. • Breach of Duty of Consideration: This includes whether Cisco knew its duty and what it did to comply with the standards. Whether Cisco breached its duty of consideration is controlled by three factors: whether it was foreseeable, whether the danger was not trivial, and whether a reasonable person in the defendant's position would have taken reasonable action. protective measures. • Damages: The damages caused by this situation could arise from the fact that Cisco's activity could encourage individual students to bring legally recommended medications and/or prescriptions into the field and could support the medications.