blog




  • Essay / Analysis of the possible causes of the mysterious events in the Bermuda Triangle

    There are many wonders in the world that we have seen throughout the creation of the Earth. But as there are wonders, mysteries are also created as man knows more about life. We view these mysteries as supernatural and may be the work of a higher being. The Bermuda Triangle is one of them. According to UCSB Geography, it was one of the most popular ports at the time, with large numbers of ships coming in and out. Their mystery involved the loss of ships and planes for over 100 years. One of the first cases was that of Flight 19 in 1950. The flight leader was believed to have witnessed supernatural events while flying over Bermuda. And several other cases like this, where they would always have the same ending, have disappeared. Most of the incidents that occurred were unexplainable, which raises the question of what people actually saw before disappearing. This is such an intriguing question that even if there are Bigfoot or Aliens, it is rumor and something that really hasn't been seen by most people. The Bermuda Triangle still remains the same, hiding and waiting to be explained by science. Sure, there are theories like mini black hole, time portal, alien abduction and stuff like that, there's still not enough evidence to actually convince people who believe in science . But there are still scientific theories. To be proven as the cause of the Bermuda Triangle event. There must be evidence that is from multiple sources, reliable and reasonable. The three main candidates considered to be the cause of the Bermuda Triangle would be Methane, Geographic and The Weather. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay To begin with, methane is a very flammable chemical in science. As a result, accidents in the Bermuda Triangle could easily be caused by a methane explosion. Methane was discovered in the 1700s, is in the form of a gas, and can be easily discovered. They are used for common daily activities such as cooking with gas, lighting, battery use, etc. With just one concentration of methane flying through the air, an explosion could easily occur. Since the ocean is full of minerals, according to the article “Is the Bermuda Triangle Really Dangerous” written by Mindy Weisberger “In March 2015, research detailed a collection of craters in the Barents Sea off the coast Norwegian. These “eruptions” occurred when warming ocean temperatures led to an increase in pressure and a release of methane from gas hydrates, the solid ice-like substance formed by gases combined with frozen water . This could very well be the cause of the disappearance. However, this theory still has many shortcomings. This information is pretty much factual and very accurate. But using another location and having a record from thousands of years ago doesn't strengthen the evidence. Also in the same article, according to Carolyn Ruppel, research geophysicist and head of the US Geological Survey "But while slow methane leaks are common in the ocean, large-scale eruptions like those that may have occurred when the period "But I think this theory would be the least likely to come true. , these incidents couldpossibly being caused by mechanical errors or running out of fuel, resulting in the aircraft being lost to the bottom and never being found. The ocean occupies more than 75% of the earth's surface. However, according to the National Ocean Service, we still haven't discovered 10% of the ocean. In the United States in particular, we don't even scratch half of it (National Ocean Service). The rest deep down is still a world unknown to human beings. From the same Flight 19 story, "another Navy plane with a crew of 13 that had been sent to search for the missing Flight 19 also never returned. Rosenberg said the Flight 19 pilots are probably lost and then ran out of gas. If they had crashed, the heavy planes would likely have broken apart on impact and sunk. » Upon reflection, based on how the story fits in 2 sources. I could say that the evidence is very reliable. However, to be logical, I don't think so. There are two reasons for this: First, we need to think about the situation in the Bermuda Triangle. There are 3 lots that make up the location. Planes could easily land and refuel. Secondly, being a military survey aircraft and rescue operation, the risk of someone making a mistake in checking their fuel or any problem in the machine is less likely. They all have to undergo training to be able to carry out this type of mission. I don't think this reason is strong enough to conclude. However, there is very little chance of this happening. The last possibility is the weather. As we all know, the weather technology of our current generation is very advanced, we can predict the weather with more than 80% accuracy and can predict one or two weeks in advance even before a storm can occur. form. Give ships a chance to avoid them by returning to land or port near the location. However, our ancestor does not even know that such technology exists. According to “Hurricanes Make Devil's Triangle Dangerous” written by Ken Kaye and published in 201, expert Jim Lushine said, “Over the past five decades, 79 hurricanes, including 26 major ones, have passed through the triangle. This year alone, six hurricanes have done so, the most recent being Hurricane Gonzalo, which hit Bermuda on October 17.” This is, in my opinion, the most questionable theory currently. As there was no information about what might happen next, the pilots or the captain of the ship cannot be aware of the danger awaiting them. A terrible accident could easily happen in bad weather. Whether this theory is true or not, I can say that at least 50% of the mysterious events happened because of the weather. The evidence is also very compelling. After several checks of the data using "Bermuda Climate, Weather and Hurricane Conditions", I found it to be roughly accurate, but this does not impact the authenticity of the evidence . I don't view the evidence as being anything biased. And finally, the evidence presented is very logical. The sea is always a dangerous place, counting the depth of the bottom and adding in the unpredictable weather conditions of the ocean. We have a terrible combination for any vehicle traveling by sea. Even though we have advanced technology, accidents can still happen. Compared to the past, there is an even greater chance of being hit by a strong wind or lightning and falling into the depths of the ocean. After carefully reviewing each theory based on its usage, reliability and logic. I think “the weather” plays a big role