The Lone Survivor was the story of four Navy SEALS who came to Afghanistan for the operation against the leader of Al-Qaeda, Sharmak, responsible for the World Trade Center tragedy. It was America's turn to act against her by capturing Sharmak. Marcus, the sole survivor, recounted the horrific experiences in Afghanistan and how his friends died in the Hindu Kush mountains. During the operation, they came across three goat herders who they suspected of being related to goat herders. The SEAL officers couldn't decide what to do with them, whether to execute the goat herders or let them go. They couldn't trust them. They tried to contact the head office, but they did not answer the call. In the end, they decided to let them go free or kill them. Morally, legally and strategically, it was difficult to make a decision. It was a dangerous task that could even lead to their death. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay If we look at this argument from a moral perspective, it is very wrong to kill unarmed civilians. These goat herders were not friendly at all. Along with this, they even said that they were not Taliban, but we cannot trust them because their intentions were not clear. Chances are the goat herders will tell Sharmak and his men. This would cause serious problems as the Taliban would attempt to disrespect the SEALs. They were left with only two choices: either kill them and ensure their safety, or let them go and prepare to be killed by the Taliban. They could save themselves or three unarmed civilians. They were there in the name of America to seek blood vengeance. They knew that letting the goat herders go would cost them their lives, which is why they have justification for killing these unarmed civilians. However, they did not have the legal right to kill the goat herders. Usually, during a military mission, soldiers make certain decisions. in order to manage things smoothly. Under American law, they had no justification for killing the shepherds because they were unarmed. Likewise, they also have the right to save their own lives. They knew they would have to spend many years in an American civilian prison with murderers and rapists if they wanted to kill the shepherds. It would be better to be in prison than to be killed by the Taliban. Furthermore, if they left them, then there would be signs of danger. Furthermore, it is important that a person who does not kill but informs someone is just as dangerous as a person who kills. In this way, they had the chance to be killed miles from their homeland. Otherwise, to save themselves, they could have found any place and hidden the bodies, and no one would have discovered that they had been killed. And then they could have been moved by their plan to track down the leader and members of Al-Qaeda. It was difficult for them to let these shepherds go on an important mission. This was the major obstacle to their mission, which is why they should have killed them. When they let the herdsmen go, after a while they should have considered the Taliban in the battle because many Taliban armed with heavily loaded rifles were there. Both actions, killing the shepherd and letting him go, require courage because both are dangerous. The Navy SEALS mission was ruined by these goat herders. They weren't murderers but they should have killed them to save,.