So much literature has emerged in recent decades with the question of how psychology "how unification can happen to all or part of psychology under a single structure, coherent and rigorous in a way that is similar to physics and biology according to Newton's laws and Dawn's theory of natural selection, respectively, the example of this type of unification found is often considered to have was unified according to Newton's laws which, in turn, depended on his mathematical discoveries Another prime example in biology is that large parts found unification in Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayAccording to Green (2015), it seems that if only psychologists could agree on these fundamental principles. The mental and/or behavioral elements and the basic principles of their interaction – then the discipline would begin to mark the kind of impressive advances we have seen in the natural sciences over the past few centuries. One of the most important aspects of these two historic scientific advances is that they not only gave a common explanatory structure for disparate aspects of a complex field of study (e.g., respectively, the movement of land cannons and that celestial plants). the seemingly ubiquitous hierarchical arrangement of species in the animal and plant kingdoms), but they were later extended and adapted to explain phenomena that were either unknown or poorly understood at the time the framework was first proposed, the electrical force, the development of antibiotic resistance), thus further strengthening the unity of the field. There have been many proposals in psychology that are similar to this type of unification. American psychology has long been a favored place for this type of work. Sigmund Kohl, on the other hand, admitted that psychology cannot be unified and renamed the field "psychological studies." Green (2015), perhaps ironically, the different proposals for unification come from several epistemological and ontological perspectives. mathematical framework likely necessary to propose the unification of theories that rigorously capture seemingly disparate phenomena. The main reasons for using formal language are three. First, a formal language can link domains with different structural properties. Second, the work of prediction and the type of explanation that relies on prediction can be very efficient and satisfactory in formal language. Finally, the ability to short-circuit the all-too-common impulse to get bogged down in endless (and often pointless) a priori arguments over which theoretical ideology to favor is achieved through formal language – e.g. behavioral, evolutionary , humanist, etc. Newton's laws of motion explain precisely this: why the apple falls directly to the ground, why the cannonball flies a certain distance before returning to the ground, and why the moon revolves around the earth in apparent perpetuity according to the Newtonian framework which was later. successfully extended to electromagnet, etc. – areas that differ in content from those Newton started with, but are similar in structure. A formal rigor that has rarely been attempted psychologically, but which has failed to facilitate psychology or explanation to any significant degree. Similarly, when psychological theorists attempted to develop a formal language to achieve both apredictive accuracy and broader reach, they failed dramatically. There was a time when psychology followed Thomas Kuhn's famous formula. There was a time when it was common to argue that psychology followed Thomas Kuhn's famous formula for the progress of mature science under the auspices of successive "paradigms" which encircle (and continue) to some extent) despite this being contrary to the first psychological systems structuralism, functionalism, psychoanalysis, gestalt behaviorism, etc. Wilhelm Wundt in 1860 made psychology scientific by engaging the methods, and perhaps more significantly, the equipment that successfully reshaped psychological phenomenon suitable for the laboratory. investigation. Wilhelm Wundt and American students shared his ideas about the psychological usefulness of kymographs and chronoscopes across the ocean and similar laboratories were established at home, in colleges and universities, the physical import of German expertise was very impressive to college administrators and presidents. various interesting candidates for a “rigorous and formal comprehensive psychological framework” have emerged over the decades; e.g. psychological, signal detection theory, game theory. Although it was valuable, it did not achieve the scope that would be necessary to unify the discipline as a whole. Kuhn's model of scientific unification was just one example of how science developed and is now of major historical interest to most philosophers and historians. of science. There is much work done by psychologist Hall's journal of the American Journal of Psychology and also followed by the psychological journal of James McKean Chattel and James Mark Baldwin in 1894. The journal was created specifically to compete with Hall's JP which has a different profile from scholarly journals in research psychology appeared at the beginning of the 20th century which had to satisfy new specialties: Journal of Abnormal Psychology (founded in 1906), Psychological Clinic (1910), Journal of Animal Behavior (1910, etc. .) were not unified by the fact that psychology began because their goal is to want psychology to cover the whole range of mental variations and to consider what forces - both internal and external - could have led it to evolve from how it did so, and how it might evolve further in the future. TB Tichener describes this extremely tumultuous situation as functionalism. Behaviorism began a few decades after functionalism. Many believe that behaviorism constitutes the first great unification of psychology which has however “lost this unity and which must now be reconquered”. Some have attempted to redefine conventional psychological language in behavioral terms while others have attempted to eschew all traditional vocabulary in favor of now behavioral language. Many student classics from the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s that were important to every student even today are considered monuments, which is the opposite. to the claim that psychology was unified under behaviorism. Steven's law of psychophysical power, Gesell's studies of childhood development, Terman's longitudinal studies of intelligence, Dollar and Mule's frustration and aggression hypothesis, the cave studies of Sheriff's Thief on group behavior, Ado No's "authoritarian personality", Ash's conformity studies, etc. significantly, dependent on behaviorist theory, but attempts have sometimes been made to integrate them into a version of behaviorism, often in order to protect them from..