The term "animal testing" refers to procedures performed on live animals for the purposes of research into biology and disease, to analyze effectiveness new products and to test the human health and environmental safety of the industry. products. Every year, more than 100 million animals, including mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, cats, frogs, hamsters, monkeys, fish, birds and guinea pigs, are killed in laboratories for medical, chemical, medicinal, cosmetic and food reasons. essay. In addition to the torture they endure on a daily basis, animals are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them and their way of life. Animals used in these types of experiments are treated as simple laboratory equipment. Animal testing is sometimes used to find a cure for a disease, but since animals are not humans, experimenting on them to find a cure for a human disease would yield unreliable results. An animal's reaction to an illness may be different than a human's, because illnesses found in animals are not the same as illnesses a human might face; animal testing would produce a reaction that would not be accurate to the human reaction. Dr. Richard Klausner, former director of the National Cancer Institute, proposed that although he and his research team found ways to "cure mice of cancer" in the past, their results could not be translated from way to heal human beings (Klausner). . Finding a cure for cancer in mice does not necessarily mean there is a cure for cancer in humans. The responses and symptoms seen in animal treatments are not the same in a human, which means that the responses and symptoms of treating a human are different from those of an animal. This helps to understand that through animal testing, although there is a cure for animal diseases, there is no cure for any human disease, because animals and humans are just two different things. To add, Professor of Neuroimaging at Aston University, Paul Furlong, says: “It is very difficult to create an animal model that even closely matches what we are trying to achieve in humans. There are many other ways to achieve better results. to find a cure for a disease or to see if cosmetic products are safe for people. Alternatives to animal testing, such as in vitro modeling, computer modeling (in silico), microdosing, etc., do not require the use of animals and are relevant to human health. These alternatives allow the results to be more precise and precise, and the animals would not be harmed in the process. Additionally, some cosmetic companies are able to create products that are safe to use without the need for animal testing. Overall, there is no justification for animal testing when it can be avoided, and millions of animals suffer needless suffering. Completely banning animal testing would not have a major impact on the world, because humans can discover and produce things (?) without harming animals during life.