Violence against women has existed since time immemorial and plays the major role of demonstrating male dominance in society. It has diminished over the years, but it still persists in many homes, everywhere behind closed doors. This violence is now associated with negative social, medical, physical and psychological problems that manifest among women of childbearing age and which specifically pose a major threat to women's health. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay. We can also better characterize violence against women as gender-based violence and it could further lead to morbidity and mortality among affected women. Depending on the type and extent of the assault, affected women could experience health, mental or physical and emotional problems which could in turn lead them to substance use and alcohol abuse, or even suicidal tendencies, which would further deteriorate their health. as a display of savagery, scholars have also come to view sexual assault as a sign and means of ensuring women's subjugation. “Sexual assault is a consequence of male-dominated customs for a long time. This masculine force is reinforced by prostitution and erotic entertainment, in which women are degraded and treated in a servile manner. For a long time, attacks have been occurring among men due to the social imbalance between people. Sexual assault must also be seen as occurring within legitimate and social structures where women were considered the property of men. In reality, the wrongful act of assault constituted a wrongful act against property since it was committed against the man who possessed it and not against the victim of the attack. As a result, sexual abuse of a woman was more of an attack on a man's property than on his integrity, ensuring that rape laws were applied as a method of securing a man's property or of his family. As a wrongful act against property, the punishment for assault usually consisted of paying a sum to the woman's father or brother or sister, which is also the case today in some countries where groups of the injured person can simply demand recompense from the attacker. Legitimate and social structures within which women are generally considered the property of their spouses further reinforce the presumption that men are qualified to have sexual relations with their wives and thus reinforce the inability to consider marital assault as a wrongdoing. Sexual assault is not only an impression of cultural processes that permit the mistreatment of women because they are not esteemed, but it itself serves to reinforce women's submission and ensure their acceptance into jobs of sexual orientation today. Sex work and cultural desires demand that women be “virgin” and “pure.” Women who do not adapt – for example, people who dress seductively – are considered to have instigated sexual assault, which in turn ensures the enforcement of these sexual orientation norms . mental problems, sexual disappointment, horrible life weight or a natural desire for hostility. Although each of these “reasons” has been used to clarify and even legitimize themale savagery, they distort an unpredictable reality: men have been instructed to identify with the world in terms of strength and control, and they have been encouraged to display wickedness. is an appropriate technique for ensuring control, resolving conflict and communicating outrage. When a manager explicitly harasses a representative, he is using her abilities to limit her chances of working and improve her position. When an abusive spouse uses beatings to keep his wife at home and prevent her from seeing her loved ones or looking for work outside, he is applying dominance and control. When men attack women, they want to overwhelm them or push them away. Whether or not a man who demonstrates savagery sees in it a flow of intensity is not the question. The way that so many men feel qualified to express their displeasure or outrage by being ferocious towards so many women shows how deeply these exercises of force and brutality have been depicted. an atmosphere of terror and weakness which limits women's possibilities for activity and controls many developments in our lives. The risk of male brutality continues to prevent women from venturing away from the conventional jobs for which they have acquired education to keep them “in their place.” A person living free from their former abuser can clearly see how their life changed when they were beaten. There could be a case where the abuser could disconnect them from the affected companions, persuade them to stop working, monitor the victim's movements to make sure they are not going anywhere and very serious and constant beatings, leaving the victim with no one to go to and I feel totally alone. At first glance, it seems that men benefit from sexism, this arrangement of male strength, control and brutality. On a deeper level, we realize that sexism hurts men as much as it hurts women. Sexism, and even more explicitly meanness toward women, hurts men because it hurts the women and girls in their lives and because it prevents them from having positive, loving associations with women. . Recently, some men have begun to understand and recognize the ways in which rough relationships with women (and other men) hurt them. The rallies were used to try to raise awareness among men and show them how to be partners with women in the fight to end brutality against women. The best way to learn the origins of brutality and its possible solutions, we must understand the connection between populism, force and cozy complicit brutality in the decor of the couples' elements. Specifically, it can be assumed that strength and misogynistic mindsets have consequences for both self and partners in terms of relational hostility. The malice of private accomplices is a critical social problem around the world and is seen regularly. Meanness can manifest in physical structures, e.g., hitting, kicking, and retching, and in passionate structures, e.g., loud attack, force, control, disconnection, mockery, use of personal information for demeaning purposes. However, regardless of structure, the savagery of personal accomplices has real consequences. Scientists have focused on the predominance of personal accomplice nastiness among married couples, couples living together, and couples who are dating. Rates of nastiness among non-heterosexual couples.